Hello everybody,
I'm working on the new upstream release 0.31 and I'm looking for this
bug [0].
But, I can not reproduce it. If I run in 0.29 and 0.31 the tests finish
successfully,
but in [1] fails in different archs. Could you reproduce it? Could you
give me some
advice/tips/clues about why
Hi Tai,
First of all thanks for the mail, and for the work in the poetry package.
Very
detailed mail, amazing :)
As mentioned Andrey, yes there's a test that failed with py3.10. The
package is
already in NEW, so we need to wait. In spite of this we can work to fix it.
I didn't investigate yet, S
Hi Andrey,
Thank you for your information. I will have a look at the failure. If
anyone has been working on this error, it would be appreciated to let me
know how I can help.
Besides, I found this thread
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2021/11/msg00025.html soon after I
sent out my previou
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:54:48PM +0100, Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote:
> [5] Some of the error messages from latest package source:
>
> short test summary info
>
> FAILED tests/inspection/test_info.py::test_info_s
Hi Emmanuel,
I failed to build the poetry deb with the latest package source[1] for some
pytest cases[4][5] since I was aware of this thread
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2021/06/msg00017.html . Do you
suggest where I should report or record the error messages I found?
By following my bu
Hello!!!
I just push some updates to salsa
Here are my comments:
>
> 1. d/control:
>
> You haven't set the Python Team either in Maintainer or Uploaders.
>
> Ready my bad! Also I note that some dependencies that I package for Poetry
were uploaded and DPT was not the Maintainer, I'll change those
On 2021-07-02 18 h 25, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> 2. d/control:
>
> If you require specific dependencies, you should make it clear in
> d/control. It's the kind of thing that helps a lot if people decide to
> backport it.
Specific _versions_ of dependencies. Sorry, Friday afternoon :)
--
On 2021-06-19 18 h 21, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I want to tell you that I push to salsa an advances of poetry packaging.
>
> Now, we have a complete package of poetry, so I'm requesting some more
> experienced reviewers.
Sorry, I said I would do this but it took me some time
Hello everybody,
I want to tell you that I push to salsa an advances of poetry packaging.
Now, we have a complete package of poetry, so I'm requesting some more
experienced reviewers.
I need to skip some tests because use a non versioned python, so that
give me some troubles like "python don't e
Hello Everybody,
I left some advances on poetry. Happily (from my point of view) we are near
to
having poetry packaged. I've just push some new commits to salsa [0].
After spend several times with the tests (see patches), we just have two
test that still fail (I didn't looking it yet):
tests/ins
Hello!
On 5/11/21 1:25 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:56 PM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>> On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> * poetry-core failing https://
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:56 PM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
> * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
> >>> are yo
Hello Sandro,
Thanks for write me.
On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
* poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
>>> are you handling this failure?
>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>
>> > * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
>>
>> are you handling this failure?
looks like this is fixed in git: do you need a sponsor?
>> > * python-cleo
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
>
> are you handling this failure?
>
> > * python-cleo in review
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I hope finished this
> week
> > * poetry still in p
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:50 AM Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> I find it amazing that you went through all the hassle of un-bundeling
> and actually packaging all the dependencies for poetry!
>
>
> Good job and thank you very much for your efforts!
>
Thanks!!
>
> Bastian
>
> --
> Dr.
Hi Emmanuel,
I find it amazing that you went through all the hassle of un-bundeling
and actually packaging all the dependencies for poetry!
Good job and thank you very much for your efforts!
Bastian
--
Dr. Bastian Venthur https://venthur.de
Debian Developer
> * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
are you handling this failure?
> * python-cleo in review https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I
> hope finished this week
> * poetry still in progress
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> ne
Hi everyone,
I leave an update about poetry packaging status.
* poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
* pastel in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pastel
* pylev in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pylev
* crashtest in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg
Hello Emmanuel,
> From the missing dependencies we have:
> * poetry-core in NEW [0]
> * pastel in NEW need for clikit [1]
> * pylev in NEW need for clikit [2]
> * crashtest has RFS need for clikit [3]
> * clikit is ready on salsa but waiting for crashtest before RFS [4]
> * cleo ready but waiting
Hi Everybody,
Happy new year.
I would leave some advances on poetry packaging.
>From the missing dependencies we have:
* poetry-core in NEW [0]
* pastel in NEW need for clikit [1]
* pylev in NEW need for clikit [2]
* crashtest has RFS need for clikit [3]
* clikit is ready on salsa but waiting fo
Hi everyone,
After read [0] and thinking about it, IMO the best solution is try to
package python-poetry,
and its dependencies. I make a very simple (and probably wrong) script [1]
to verify the
package that will be need package into Debian, before poetry package.
[{'name': 'cleo'}, {'name': 'cli
Hi everyone,
In the last week I re-take this work.
But, we need to discuss the poetry situation. First of all, poetry upstream
doesn't consider
adding vendor libs to the source. They have their reasons about this
situation. I recommend
you read this [0] [1].
The problem here, is that poetry need
Hi,
I see some updates on the salsa repository, any chance we can get this
package ready before the next freeze so we'll have it in the next stable
release?
Cheers,
Bastian
On 29.06.20 06:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
Hi,
I'm workin
On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0].
>
>Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy,
>cleo,
>etc.
>
>I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on
>cli
Hi,
I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0].
Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy, cleo,
etc.
I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on clikit
that is not on Debian (if I search correctly).
Bastian Venthur n
DEAR SIR
I humbly try to reach you, for the fact that it is like this, that is why i decided to write to you for educationnal help for these two helpless children who has now no help as the case may be please sir,I dearly plead in the name of almighty GOD, this is for almight GOD your doing this,N
DEAR SIR
I humbly try to reach you, for the fact that it is like this, that is why i decided to write to you for educationnal help for these two helpless children who has now no help as the case may be please sir,I dearly plead in the name of almighty GOD, this is for almight GOD your doing this,N
28 matches
Mail list logo
