Hi,
On Sun, 04.10.2009 at 00:00:16 +0200, Jonas Meurer
wrote:
> thus we need to migrate our debian/rules to build zope2.12 with the help
> of buildout, whether we like it or not. unfortunately buildout seems to
> be a real pain for building distribution packages. it hardcodes absolute
> pathna
hey again,
On 20/09/2009 Matthias Klose wrote:
> The zope2.12 release candidate was released last week. I updated the
> packaging in the zope team repository. An upload still requires some
> work, because some modules still need to be packaged. These are:
zope2.12.0 final was released some days
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 02.07.2009 13:05, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>> why not wait for zope2.12 with python2.5/2.6 support, upload that one to
>> debian/unstable and afterwards file a request for removal for
>> zope2.10/zope2.11/python2.4? I believe that a zo
hey,
On 20/09/2009 Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 20.09.2009 16:45, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> >if i got it right then packaging the dependencies as seperate packages
> >isn't an option for zope2.12, we'll have to include them within the
> >zope2.10 source tarball. the reason for that is, that zope2.12 req
On 20.09.2009 16:45, Jonas Meurer wrote:
if i got it right then packaging the dependencies as seperate packages
isn't an option for zope2.12, we'll have to include them within the
zope2.10 source tarball. the reason for that is, that zope2.12 requires
particular versions of the dependencies, and
hey,
On 20/09/2009 Matthias Klose wrote:
> The zope2.12 release candidate was released last week. I updated the
> packaging in the zope team repository. An upload still requires some
> work, because some modules still need to be packaged. These are:
>
> Acquisition DateTime ExtensionClass
> P
On 02.07.2009 13:05, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 23/06/2009 Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Were you aware that we've renumbered the releases and inserted a less
ambitious Plone 4, which should be in beta by the end of the year? It
will run on (and require) Zope 2.12. Plone is finally joining the modern
P
Hello,
* 2009-07-02 14:05, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> why not wait for zope2.12 with python2.5/2.6 support, upload that one to
> debian/unstable and afterwards file a request for removal for
> zope2.10/zope2.11/python2.4? I believe that a zope2.12 release candidate
> will be published within the next m
On 23/06/2009 Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> > Were you aware that we've renumbered the releases and inserted a less
> > ambitious Plone 4, which should be in beta by the end of the year? It
> > will run on (and require) Zope 2.12. Plone is finally joining the modern
> > Python world. :-)
>
> I don'
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:48:41PM -0400, Erik Rose wrote:
> Buildout is really a development tool and not universally lauded as a
> deployment solution (though it's ubiquitous right now simply because
> it's the only thing that works). It suffers many reliability issues in
> both its design
(filtering out some of the interested mailing lists)
* 2009-06-23 20:19, Erik Rose wrote:
> I'm sad to see Plone support go, as I have a lot of reservations about
> how Plone is distributed these days.
FWIW, I'm sad too and I share your same reservations about how Plone is
distributed.
> Actua
11 matches
Mail list logo
