Re: [RFC] Python 3 support in CDBS

2010-11-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:28 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >[Barry Warsaw, 2010-11-22] >> What specifically does dh need to do better now, after you cdbs patch? > >it needs someone who likes to program in "you can do it in 1000+1 ways" >(aka Perl) ;-), see bugs 596807 and 597105. Ah, you used the word

Re: [RFC] Python 3 support in CDBS

2010-11-22 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Barry Warsaw, 2010-11-22] > What specifically does dh need to do better now, after you cdbs patch? it needs someone who likes to program in "you can do it in 1000+1 ways" (aka Perl) ;-), see bugs 596807 and 597105. dh doesn't recognize python3-foo packages and thus doesn't do magic to build/inst

Re: [RFC] Python 3 support in CDBS

2010-11-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 21, 2010, at 01:52 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >CDBS is not that popular among maintainers of Python related packages >(dh rules!) so I wrote python3-distutils.mk (based on >python-distutils.mk) for it hoping that dh lovers will now do their best >to support Python 3 better than CDBS does wi

[RFC] Python 3 support in CDBS

2010-11-20 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
CDBS is not that popular among maintainers of Python related packages (dh rules!) so I wrote python3-distutils.mk (based on python-distutils.mk) for it hoping that dh lovers will now do their best to support Python 3 better than CDBS does with attached patch. I hope dh will win (again) so I'm send