2] No such file or directory:
'/usr/lib/python23.zip'
^^^
gimp: 1.2.5-2
gimp-python: 1.2-6
python: 2.3-4
Any clue?
--
'(wave++ "Yuri D'Elia" "http://www.yuv.info/";)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:23
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:33:26AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Now, I could do the dependency on python (>= 2.2), python (<<2.3) thing.
> But what would that gain me or users? I see no benefit there, other than
> people tracking sid would find OfflineIMAP uninstallable until it gets
> updated to
Hi Brian,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:08:57AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a package that I am getting ready for my sponsor to upload.
> I began getting these errors when I upgraded my python debs from stable to
> the unstable versions.
>
> checking for gtk.py... no
> configure: error
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:37:44PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > Torsten, Christian, this package is installable (again?). Tagged as
> > fixed.
>
> It is in fact not installable in unstable because libpanel-applet0 is
> no longer available. I'll fix this with
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: python-gnome (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 183250 [ ] python-gnome: Package un-installable
>
> Torsten, Christian, this package is installable (again?). T
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:28:53PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
> One final point. We will almost definitely not switch the default
> python in sid (current unstable), until there is talk that Sarge is
> nearing a freeze. There is simply no point in undergoing the pain of
> a major python release tw
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 01:22:59AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Most of it works, but the opengl stuff is not working (missing
> python2.2-opengl, will NMU if time permits). Next step will be
> getting python2.2-gnome2 working.
Just built python2.2-gnome2 and uploaded to experime
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:09:33AM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> > that route. But - do we want to continue supporting the old gnome
> > for sarge? Otherwise I would be for removing the old binding
> > entirely before the next release. Just wondering if any dependent
> > package will be updated
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 12:07:19AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> ===
> 3.
> ===
> Quite messy, but...
> Since python-gtk2 require python2.2 or later, we let python2.1-gtk
> install as upstream does (in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/) and
> install python2.2-gtk in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:53:21PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> I just uploaded a slightly updated python-gnome2 and python-gtk2
> packages to http://klecker.debian.org/~tca . They are apt-get'able
> using:
>
> deb http://klecker.debian.org/~tca unstable main
> deb-src http://klecker.debian.o
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 08:40:02AM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> > If people really need 2.2, then it doesn't need to be the default anyway...
> > just use the python2.2- packages...
>
> Except that a lot of packages only exist as python. python-gtk and
> pygame come to mind for example.
Just u
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 12:40:36AM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> > - remove python1.5 from unstable
>
> and all packages depending on it. right.
Not a big deal, it seems. Just checked - all packages depending on
python1.5 are available for python(2.1) already.
Greetings
Torst
Hi Federico,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 12:40:36AM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> eheh. given that sarge won't be stable for another 12 months
> (optimistically) 2.3 will have plenty of time to stabilize.
Remembering what aj said I think it would be wise to expect a
release at any time since
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:11:11AM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> I don't know what exactly is going on, but it's probably something in
> python-gnome. I'm passing this along to its maintainer.
>
> (Torsten: I suspect the fix for #59713 got rolled back somewhere along
> the line, or something sim
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:32:58PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > If you ask me, scripts for that should go into the python package so
> > that not every python-xxx package has to carry them itself. Something
> > like /usr/lib/python/new-module $(pkgname) should do all the
> > preprocessing.
>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> A pythonX.Y package must have
>
> 1) a postinst script to byte-compile all previously installed
>packages who use dh_purepython
>
> 2) a prerm script to remove byte-compiled files from all previously
>installed packag
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:53:53AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> During discussion in debian-devel, it was pointed out that
> byte-compiled python code is cross-platform, and thus it should be
> architecture: any.
I think you mean arch: all. Any means a rebuild for each architecture.
More in
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:45:01AM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:56:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > ok, I'm giving up, just wanted to finish the python transition. please
> > could somebody look at #128349?
>
> Apologies for all your trouble. The University network ha
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 05:33:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Where do we head? We want to upload these new packages to unstable on
> Tuesday (2001-10-30) or Wednesday (2001-10-31). Because most of the
> python dependent packages in Debian have unversioned dependencies on
> the python version
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 12:06:46PM -0400, dman wrote:
> Thanks! I was searching for "libglade".
>
> Hint to Torsten : put the word "libglade" in the Description:
> somewhere to aid 'apt-cache search'.
Done for the next release.
cu
Torsten
pgp657nCfrHph.pgp
Description: PGP signature
20 matches
Mail list logo
