] Error 1
It looks like xvfb-run fails to start the Xvfb background process properly.
You can run xvfb-run with '-e errfile' to get the output of Xvfb. Xvfb and
xvfb-run come with the 'xvfb' package, by the way, which is version 4.2.1-6
here (up to date unstable), and all seems t
modified Togl to
work properly) but that's easily fixed.
See also my original mentor request:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200301/msg00164.html
and its followup.
--
Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
, pythoncard-doc
depends on python2.2-pythoncard or python2.3-pythoncard. You need either of
the latter two installed to install the former. In other words, you can't
install pythoncard-doc (with examples) if you don't have the python
libraries installed to actually run the examples or
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 05:23:17PM +0100, Thomas Wouters wrote:
> Hi, my name is Thomas Wouters and I'm looking for a mentor. :)
> The PyOpenGL debian package, python-opengl, is heavily outdated, being
> version 1.5.7 whereas the upstream stable version is 2.0.0.44 by now. It
&
not a python2.2-in-debian bug either.
Look at the path: /usr/local. Nothing in Debian installs things in
/usr/local. You installed Python in the non-debian way, and it's interfering
with your debian-installed python software. Remove it, and software will be
happy again. This is the same reason the compileall -q wasn't working.
--
Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
Hi, my name is Thomas Wouters and I'm looking for a mentor. :)
The PyOpenGL debian package, python-opengl, is heavily outdated, being
version 1.5.7 whereas the upstream stable version is 2.0.0.44 by now. It
also has some other issues, like being built against the wrong version of
Tk. PyO
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 08:34:37PM +0200, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:14:17 +0100, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So... if you link glibc with files compiled by a NON-GNU compiler, the
> > resulting binary *has to be* glibc [I meant GPL] ?
strength of) their
licence.
> Silly, not ?? ;-)
Definately.
--
Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
8 matches
Mail list logo