Re: Convenience copies of python extensions

2011-10-21 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
de? I think it does. > Do I have to undo this causing the ap to use the extension as a seperate > external package? That would be better, yes specially if this library is already in Debian or if it is used by other packages and could be shared. -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo | `-&

Re: Introduction

2011-10-12 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
ude po and pot files); everything else is XML. How did you come to that conclusion? The main script, itstool itself, is written in Python! My package does not depend on python for no reason… -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo | `-'Debian Maintainer \_ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Introduction

2011-10-12 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
mine, in fact. :-) But that may change and it is a generic tool that could be used by people outside of GNOME. But although it is not part of Python, it is written in Python and I think this is the point of PAPT, am I mistaking? -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo | `-'Debian Maintainer

Introduction

2011-10-12 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
a Debian team before. Cheers, -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo | `-'Debian Maintainer \_ ¹ Yes, I know git-svn, but it is still quite different from pure Git, and I am not sure this can be easily adapted to the packaging workflows. signature.asc Description: Digital signature