Re: Bug#1088764: pocketsphinx-python: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.13

2024-12-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Just FTR, the patch I had tried to add to the sphinxbase package to try to get pocketsphinx-python expose a proper __iter__ method. It does return a new object, but doesn't duplicate ptr, thus deemed to get duplicate frees and whatnot. Samuel Samuel Thibault, le lun. 02 déc. 2024 02:58:51

Re: Bug#1088764: pocketsphinx-python: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.13

2024-12-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Graham Inggs, le sam. 30 nov. 2024 17:41:54 +, a ecrit: > The autopkgtests of this package fail with Python 3.13 [1]. It looks like python 3.13 now requires the iterator (not just the interable) to provide an __iter__ method. I don't see how to do that with the pocketsphinx interface:

Simple module for python-based cgi?

2024-06-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I used to use the cgi module to implement simple python-based cgi scripts for mere http forms. But it is getting deprecated https://peps.python.org/pep-0594/#cgi and concerning form support: FieldStorage/MiniFieldStorage has no direct replacement, but can typically be replaced by using

Re: Enabling salsa-ci on all Debian Python Team repos

2022-09-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Emanuele Rocca, le mer. 21 sept. 2022 12:01:21 +0200, a ecrit: > The only work left to be done on your machine is a binary build to see > if the packages look good, perhaps some specific manual testing [1], > > [1] though that may be an opportunity for writing a new autopkgtest! Yes, nowa

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

2022-08-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Dmitry Shachnev, le dim. 21 août 2022 16:18:53 +0300, a ecrit: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 03:11:59PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Dmitry Shachnev, le dim. 21 août 2022 16:04:36 +0300, a ecrit: > > > Samuel Thibault > > >dogtail > &g

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

2022-08-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Dmitry Shachnev, le dim. 21 août 2022 16:04:36 +0300, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault >dogtail ? it's using python3-nose2, not python-nose. Samuel

PyConFR and python packaging

2019-08-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, For information, PyConFR (in french) will take place in Bordeaux from october 31th to november 3rd. There will most probably be an workshop on upt (universal packaging tool, https://framagit.org/upt/upt) Samuel

Re: Removing python2 packages

2019-07-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le mer. 31 juil. 2019 03:08:22 +0200, a ecrit: > IIRC, the uncruft script doesn't react immediately, you'd have to wait > for something like days or a couple of weeks. That said, https://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt doesn't show these python

Re: Removing python2 packages

2019-07-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le mer. 31 juil. 2019 03:08:22 +0200, a ecrit: > Thomas Goirand, le mer. 31 juil. 2019 00:13:24 +0200, a ecrit: > > On 7/30/19 11:40 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > >> Do you mean, will python-foo be

Re: Removing python2 packages

2019-07-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Goirand, le mer. 31 juil. 2019 00:13:24 +0200, a ecrit: > On 7/30/19 11:40 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Do you mean, will python-foo be automatically removed from Sid/Testing, > >> after your upload? Normally yes, if nothing depends on it. And

Re: Python2.7.13/16 build quality expectation mismatch

2019-07-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ilari Jääskeläinen, le lun. 22 juil. 2019 06:01:36 +, a ecrit: > Very poor quality (unusable) builds w/o Tk and blit + w/ openssl-1.0.2. ? python is built with tk support, and recent openssl. Please be more specific in the issue you are having. Samuel

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 15:47:36 +0200, a ecrit: > So I found a way to build locally, using your suggestions. In my case I > guess I could upload directly the output of the nocheck build as the bin > package isn't altered. Yes, but better request a binnmu after the uploa

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

2018-08-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with so that one can easily (re)bootstrap the circle at any time by using DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck dpkg-buildpa