Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-20 Thread Omer Zak
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 12:08 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > On 21/02/2013 11:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm all for easy. I have yet to see a full source (regardless of VCS) or > > git > > workflow that I didn't find more complex and harder to remember/do > > correctly > > than what we have

Re: GUI tool for packaging

2012-11-09 Thread Omer Zak
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 13:19 +, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > In my opinion, the best way to do that is to build a GUI that holds > the user's hand through the process of packaging, showing them the > options available. It should be particularly useful for occasional > packagers who don't want to rem

[OFFTOPIC] Re: Re: Future of python2.6 in Debian

2012-06-17 Thread Omer Zak
Is the empty message meant to say that python2.6 has no future in Debian? :-) On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Jacques Brassé wrote: > > -- $ python >>> type(type(type)) My own blog is at http://www.zak.co.il/tddpirate/ My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine al

Re: Discuss Python plans for (early) wheezy cycle

2011-01-20 Thread Omer Zak
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 17:47 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > >[Barry Warsaw, 2011-01-20] > >> If I may make a radical suggestion though: what do you think about making > >> Python 3 the default for Wheezy? > > > >over my dead body ;-P > > Okay,

Re: Is it worth back porting PEP 3147 to Python < 3.2?

2010-04-20 Thread Omer Zak
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:39 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 20, 2010, at 06:50 AM, Omer Zak wrote: > > >My take of the situation: > >Yes, please backport PEP 3147 to at least Python 2.7. > >The rationale: we'll need to support both Python 2.x and Python 3.x for

Re: Is it worth back porting PEP 3147 to Python < 3.2?

2010-04-19 Thread Omer Zak
My take of the situation: Yes, please backport PEP 3147 to at least Python 2.7. The rationale: we'll need to support both Python 2.x and Python 3.x for several years, and it will be nice if the same library package can be made to support both 2.x and 3.x. It would also be nice to define a way to s

Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision

2009-12-12 Thread Omer Zak
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 14:27 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > Ben Finney schrieb: > > anatoly techtonik writes: > > > >> The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent > >> citing Debian Policy in private talks. > > > > Why is it ridiculous? Is it any more ridiculous to put