Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> (that's just my subjective opinion, please don't start a flame war now)
>
> It's a rather strongly worded opinion; if you want to avoid flame wars, you
> might find it helpful to bring specific criticisms to the table instead of
> just declaring a solution "ugly". :
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> /me whinges that switching to bzr for packaging in general would be a
>> much nicer thing overall, since then ubuntu downstream is pretty well
>> bzr...
>>
>> (note: I use bzr for all
/me whinges that switching to bzr for packaging in general would be a
much nicer thing overall, since then ubuntu downstream is pretty well
bzr...
(note: I use bzr for all of my other projects, so I have a vested interest)
However... _anything_ is an improvement over svn.
Monty
Piotr Ożarowski
Ben Finney wrote:
> Early in the 7.0.x series, debhelper gained the ability to detect a
> Python package and run 'dh_pysupport' in the 'install' sequence,
> allowing a single-line 'dh install' to perform all the tasks needed in
> an 'install' target. However, it currently seems to lack correspondi
Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> You may want to add Homepage field to source stanza of debian/control
> and a debian/watch file (this will help the use of svn-buildpackage
> too).
>
> Moreover, there should be a better way to use Debian TinyMCE than just
> removing almost everything with a
On Thursday, Oct 30, 2003, at 20:59 US/Central, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Monty Taylor wrote:
I've been told that I should ask here for help with sponsoring of
debian
packages that are in python.
I thought the policy was never to ask on package specific
Hi guys,
I've been told that I should ask here for help with sponsoring of debian
packages that are in python. If there's anyone who would like to upload
this for me, I'd appreciate it. It's mainly just to close an NMU bug.
The relevant files can be found at
http://debian.inaugust.com
plywood (
7 matches
Mail list logo
