On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 09:39:45PM +0200, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> > BTW, what's the reason of making packages containing .py files? Is not it
> > better to include only .pyo and .pyc files? And for those who really need
> > sources there those source packages?
>
> No! These are needed at run-time,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:31:10PM +0100, JИrТme Marant wrote:
> There is no need to include .pyc and .pyo in packages as python programs
> can work without at first use. Moreover, this makes packages
> bigger.
BTW, what's the reason of making packages containing .py files? Is not it
better
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:44:36PM +0200, JИrТme Marant wrote:
> > I am pretty sure that python- prefix is for packages that provide some
> > functionality
> > in /usr/lib/site-python, /usr/lib/python{version}/site-packages
>
> Do you mean those whose .py files directly fit in site-packages itsel
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 11:16:13AM +0200, JИrТme Marant wrote:
> Do all Debian python packages have to be prefixed by 'python-' ?
> I recently packaged the "pyunit" software and I still don't
> know if I have to rename it python-unit or if I can keep its
> name as is.
Looks like there is at least o
4 matches
Mail list logo
