Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 22:20, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all > binNMUs > >> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should

Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there! > > During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November > if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time > has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to > open this thr

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 22:11, wrote: > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 11:45 +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote: > > ghisv...@gmail.com writes: > > > Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour for a modern stack, > > > including > > > Python 3. > > > > > > However, upgrading NumPy et al. to their Python 3 only version

request to join the dpmt team

2018-07-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, I would like to join the Debian Python Modules Team. I'm going to be working on the Python 3.7 transition in Ubuntu and being able directly fix things in Debian would definitely make the world a better place :) My salsa username is mwhudson. I have read https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/to

Re: Packaging with 2to3

2017-12-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 19 December 2017 at 10:26, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi, > > I want to create a package (pyraf, #711038) for both Python2 and > Python3. While the package itself is still not Python 3 compatible, > upstream says that running through 2to3 will make it; however the > resulting code is not Python 2

Re: snap in debian

2017-10-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 9 October 2017 at 13:22, Brian May wrote: > On 2017-10-09 10:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > > It's the default for it to be off, so I doubt this is your problem unless > you have added "apparmor=1 security=apparmor" to your kernel command line. > &

Re: snap in debian

2017-10-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 9 October 2017 at 12:36, Brian May wrote: > On 2017-10-09 10:30, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > > I've rebuilt my VM and things seem to mostly work (so long as I leave > apparmor off). Can you provide reproduction instructions for either of your > problems? > >

Re: snap in debian

2017-10-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 5 October 2017 at 09:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On 5 October 2017 at 09:52, Brian May wrote: > >> Michael Hudson-Doyle writes: >> > Can you elaborate? Do you have apparmor enabled? I am aware that there >> ar

Re: snap in debian

2017-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 5 October 2017 at 09:52, Brian May wrote: > Michael Hudson-Doyle writes: > > Can you elaborate? Do you have apparmor enabled? I am aware that there > are > > problems on stable currently but being explicit reduces guessing. > > See the stack overflow question. The m

Re: snap in debian

2017-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
snapd maintainer here... On 2 October 2017 at 09:49, Brian May wrote: > Ghislain Vaillant writes: > > > May I ask what would be the benefit for pycharm to be in Debian, when we > > already have the official Jetbrains Toolbox App or the snap package as > > means to install and update the applica

Re: removing python3-trollius

2017-07-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 13 July 2017 at 11:46, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On 10 July 2017 at 21:52, Tristan Seligmann > wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 11:45 Michael Hudson-Doyle < >> michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> python3-trollius fail

Re: removing python3-trollius

2017-07-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 10 July 2017 at 21:52, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 11:45 Michael Hudson-Doyle < > michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> >> python3-trollius fails tests with Python 3.6 and rather than think about >> why, I think it makes more se

removing python3-trollius

2017-07-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, python3-trollius fails tests with Python 3.6 and rather than think about why, I think it makes more sense to stop building trollius for Python 3. It's reason for existence is to backport asyncio to older Python 3 versions (and Python 2, but I'm not talking about the python 2 package here). As

Re: Python3.6 plans​ for Buster

2017-06-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 24 June 2017 at 06:09, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, June 17, 2017 04:20:27 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Python3.6 is already in Unstable and I expect to see it in Testing soon > > after Stretch is released. > > > > I've just now uploaded a version of python3-defaults to Experimental