o one configure+build+install per python version).
Thanks,
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
>
> Control: reopen -1 7.0.0-1
> Control: retitle -1 python3-openvdb: build against the default python3 version
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:10:49 +0100 Mathieu Malaterre
[CC me please]
Could someone please point me to a c++ based package which provides
both a python2 and python3 binding. I'd like to start working toward
#849426 (new upstream is now using cmake as possible build system
instead of the old Makefile based one).
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> So if anybody in the Python team would like to take over from here on
> I'd be really happy. Otherwise I consider either orphaning the package
> or ask ftpmaster for removal.
[...]
Orphan bug report was sent in April 2013:
https://bu
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/21/2015 11:59 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Has anyone seen this lately:
>>
>> $ svn ci -m"prepare package"
>> Sendingdebian/changelog
>> Sendingdebian/
[CC me please]
Has anyone seen this lately:
$ svn ci -m"prepare package"
Sendingdebian/changelog
Sendingdebian/control
Sendingdebian/rules
Sendingdebian/watch
Transmitting file data svn: E13: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E13: Can't create direct
[Please CC me]
I am reviewing some python packages. On my jessie machine here is what
I am seeing:
$ dget -u
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-udiskie/python-udiskie_1.1.2-1.dsc
$ cd python-udiskie*
$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
$ lintian -I ../python-udiskie_1.1.2-1_a
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Mathieu Malaterre, 2014-06-11]
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > I am starring at #744748. I do not understand how ${python:Depends}
>> > get changed into `python-pillow` for
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> [CC me please]
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am starring at #744748. I do not understand how ${python:Depends}
> get changed into `python-pillow` for dh_python2. The bug is not really
> that annoying except that it prevent
[CC me please]
Dear all,
I am starring at #744748. I do not understand how ${python:Depends}
get changed into `python-pillow` for dh_python2. The bug is not really
that annoying except that it prevent a backport of python-openslide
(python 2.x) to wheezy, since python-pillow is only in jessie (I
[CC me please]
Hi,
I am trying to work on :
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740907
Basically I have an example package (dh_installexamples) which needs
to depends on python-flask. Depending whether my users installed
python3-openslide or python-openslide, I need to Recomme
[CC me please]
Dear all,
I am trying to build a python3 package from an existing package:
openslide-python.
After following recommendations from:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide
Here is what I get:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python3-openslide/filelist
clearly it
[CC me pls]
Hi there,
I am starring at the following warning:
warning: package python-gdcm: unused substitution variable ${python:Versions}
My package reads as:
$ cat d/control
Source: gdcm
...
X-Python-Version: 2.7
...
Package: python-gdcm
Section: python
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shl
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
...
> $ readelf -d /usr/lib/pyshared/python2.7/libvtkgdcmPython.so
>
> Dynamic section at offset 0x1de0 contains 26 entries:
> Tag Type Name/Value
> 0x0001 (NEEDED)
[CC me please]
Hi there,
I am looking for more information about [1] and [2]. Here is my
current issue. GDCM ships a python module which in turn links to a
shared libs. It looks like this:
$ readelf -d /usr/lib/pyshared/python2.7/libvtkgdcmPython.so
Dynamic section at offset 0x1de0 contains 2
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Mathieu Malaterre , 2012-04-12, 12:32:
>
>>>> Since every single python module suffer from this, I thought there would
>>>> be something very simple.
>>>
>>> No, most of Python extension
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Mathieu Malaterre , 2012-04-12, 09:04:
>
>> I am trying to remove the annoying 'todo' section of the gdcm package
>> page:
>>
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
>>
>> If this w
Jakub,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Mathieu Malaterre , 2012-04-11, 17:43:
>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
>> debian/python-gdcm/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/_gdcmswig.so
>> contains an unresolvable reference to symbol PyObject_IsTrue: it's
>
Paul,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> I am trying to remove the remaining warnings from the gdcm/python
>> package. They can be seen here:
>
> That is pretty normal for plugins o
[CC me please]
Hi there,
I am trying to remove the remaining warnings from the gdcm/python
package. They can be seen here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdcm&arch=powerpc&ver=2.2.0-10&stamp=1334158394
copied here for convenience:
...
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
debian/python-gd
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Mathieu Malaterre, 2011-11-29]
>> I am trying to fix bug #649904. I have been talking with upstream,
>> and apparently the install process on debian is doing something weird
>> after the line "running insta
[Please CC me]
Hi all,
I am trying to fix bug #649904. I have been talking with upstream,
and apparently the install process on debian is doing something weird
after the line "running install_data", see for instance :
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pylibtiff&arch=i386&ver=0.3.0
[CC me please]
hi all,
2011/11/22 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
[...]
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I don't think that your problem can be solved in any simple way, apart from
> physically moving the script or providing a second helper script.
>
> This is a very unfortunate interaction between Python semanti
[CC me please]
Hi all,
The issue with multiarray came back. I manage to get things working
for the tifffile package installing the tifffile.py into
/usr/bin/tiffile (removing the py extension). However another package
is now failing: CellProfiler. Symptoms are:
$ python /usr/lib/python2.7/dis
2011/11/16 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On 11/16/2011 10:03 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> [CC me please]
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am trying to package a tiny python module:
>>
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/ti
[CC me please]
Hi all,
I am trying to package a tiny python module:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tifffile/tifffile_2012-1.dsc
I thought I did it right, but I cannot load the python module
properly when installed, it fails with:
$ python /usr/share/pyshared/tifffile.py
T
[Please CC me]
Hi all,
Could someone please have a look at the following package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyplusplus
It generate an egg-info with a surprising name:
$ dpkg -c python-py++_1.0.0-1_amd64.deb|grep egg
-rw-r--r-- root/root 338 2011-11-04 17:43
./usr/share/pyshar
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> I am trying to package a python module which load the real C library using
>> cType. I am using dh_python2 but I seem to be missing something as the
>> dependencies is still not quite right.
>>
>> $ apt-cache show python-openslide
>> ...
>> Depe
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> The full debian/* package can be found at:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-openslide/trunk/
Sorry I meant:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/openslide-python/trunk
Dear all,
[Please CC me as I am not subscribed]
I am trying to package a python module which load the real C library
using cType. I am using dh_python2 but I seem to be missing something
as the dependencies is still not quite right.
$ apt-cache show python-openslide
...
Depends: python2.6 |
Dear debian-python,
I am trying to solve the following issue (*). Basically Python.h is
not found.
In order to reproduce it, I tried changing the default python
version. Here is where I got to.
I read:
http://codeghar.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/update-alternatives-in-debian/
http://www.linuxque
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, Mathieu Malaterre wrote to say that having a SOVERSION on a
> python module is wrong, with reference to an oblique comment from
> Josselin Mouette [1].
>
> Is this true? What is the rationale for
31 matches
Mail list logo
