Steffen Mutter wrote:
> >> If SPE keeps on being orphaned I
> >> will try to package SPE myself, although it would be nicer if a debian
> >> developer wants to adopt SPE.
> >>
> >
> > The wnpp bug was renamed to an ITA by Stefano Canepa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > adding him as CC to this mail.
Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > > I suggest to disable the above two modules in python2.2 (which is in
> > > woody), even if existing applications can break. What do you think?
> >
> > I'd rather know about the vulnerability (and maybe doko is able to
> > implement a fix) than to blindly castrate so
Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just read this Post from Guido van Rossum[1] that the rexec.py and
> Bastian.py modules have severe security flaws. These modules will be
> disabled in the next 2.2 and 2.3 releases to avoid security risks.
> [1]
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=mailman
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have requested to remove Grail from slink since it doesn't seem
> to work for everybody and the new version is still non-free.
Since nobody has stepped in to maintain grail I have not requested
its entire removal.
Regards,
Joey
--
Hi,
I have requested to remove Grail from slink since it doesn't seem
to work for everybody and the new version is still non-free.
As I said I'm not going to package up another non-free version of
Grail. I'm not happy about this since I found Grail an interesting
project which should be honored.
Hi,
I've just uploaded grail into non-free.
I have worked on grail because I like the idea of writing a fully
fledged web browser in a scripting language (like Perl or Python.
Unfortunately the package is not free, according to the DFSG[1]. I
was about to skip the whole thing after I first read
Hi,
I had a small chat with two of the Grail/CNRI developers and
decided that the License is DFSG free. I'm attaching it requesting
for comments. I'll upload the package later. If somebody wants to
maintain this package, please drop me a line.
_
Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'd like to entirely cancel my last mail wrt grail. I saw it and
> removed it entirely. The licence is just fucked up.
>
> [..]
> this Agreement does not authorize Licensee to distribute copies of
> the Software to the public, per
I'd like to entirely cancel my last mail wrt grail. I saw it and
removed it entirely. The licence is just fucked up.
[..]
this Agreement does not authorize Licensee to distribute copies of
the Software to the public, perform and/or display the Software
publicly, or otherwise make
I wonder if somebody is working on packaging Grail.
Regards,
Joey
--
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer. -- Perl book
10 matches
Mail list logo
