Re: Summary of python transition problems

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > * gimp-python: #207304 > > automake problem, which it seems I failed to fix. > > but one of it's build-dep's is listed as: > > -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -) > > * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield > * Valid candidate > > so p

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:33:26AM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote: > > > Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* > > > packages every time python* is mentioned? :P > > > hmmm.. just curious... why? > > The short of it: he's joking. Note the smiley. Even though package > n

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:31:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Last weekend, python 2.3 was released. > With the next python2.3 upload, python2.3 becomes the default python > version. Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages every time python* is mentioned? :P

Re: lintian version check for Python fixed (or not)?

On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:29:24PM +0200, Raphael Bossek wrote: > $ lintian epydoc_1.0-1_all.deb > E: epydoc: python-script-but-no-python-dep > ./usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/epydoc/cli.py > E: epydoc: python-script-but-no-python-dep > ./usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/epydoc/gui.py > E: epyd

Re: How to smoothly merge packages ?

On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 11:46:40PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > I'd like to merge back some python packages (python-net, python-misc, > python-bsddb and python-curses) into python-base. > > Now quite a lot third-party packages depend e.g. on python-net. What's > the best method to ensure a smo