Re: Bug#362532: ITA: python-medusa

2006-04-15 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
> I have prepared a new package using cdbs. However, i saw that there is > already a debian/ directory into the upstream source, so i have removed > it. I don't know if it was a good idea to do that ? I think there is no fixed rule, and usually the best thing to do is coordinate with upstream.

Re: Bug#362532: RFA: python-medusa

2006-04-14 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
>I took a look at python-medusa and i wonder why you haven't > included docs/ and demo/ directories into the package ? Probably just an oversight. By the way, there's an Ubuntu patch that might save a little time. http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/python-medusa/ Good luck with the pa

Bug#362532: RFA: python-medusa

2006-04-13 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am no longer using python-medusa, so want to put it up for adoption (maybe for someone who is into python). The package is in fine shape, probably just needs a little updating as Debian shifts to python 1.4, etc. Not heavily used, no serious bugs reported, but sh