No longer uploading mercurial

Hi, I have been uploading mercurial for some years, but since November I'm struggling to find time to work on the package. I don't think I will have time to keep up with mercurial's release schedule when stretch is released. Cheers, Javi signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposed git migration plan

Hi Sandro, On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:13:32AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > Here's the page I mentioned regarding a *proposed* transition plan to using > > git for team packages. It's more or less a brain dump right now, and don't > > feel

Re: DebConf14 svn->git migration BOF notes

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 04:24:29AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > - Tag names: > * Use the normal pristine-tar upstream/ for upstream tags > * For debian tags corresponding to uploads: debian/ as > "debcommit -r" does (please use "git tag -s" and sign your tags) You can use "debcommit --si

Re: Package adoptions

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:24:34AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 02/18/2013 04:43 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > ❦ 4 février 2013 20:00 CET, Örjan Persson : > > > >> I don't have the time to maintain my packages anymore. I just wanted to > >> check with you guys first if you're interested in

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 03:27:08PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10: > >On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote: > >>The following four positions have all been advocated in this thread: > >> > >>A - Maintain the status quo, in which DPMT packa

Re: Package adoptions

2013/2/4 Örjan Persson : > Hi, > > I don't have the time to maintain my packages anymore. I just wanted to > check with you guys first if you're interested in adopting the packages > before I RFA them. The packages are python-setproctitle[1], > python-greenlet[2] and python-gevent[3]. > > [1] https

bug in backports that affects wheezy

Hi debian-python, I'm not sure how to deal with #699405 [0]. It's a bug in squeeze-backports but presumably it also affects wheezy (I have to check that). Assuming that it does affect wheezy, should I upgrade it to "important", fix it in wheezy and then backport it to squeeze-backports? [0] htt

Re: Some thoughts about py{support,central} -> dh_python2 conversion

On 07/08/11 21:29, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Dear all, > > If you can't resist the urge to convert your packages from > python-support to dh_python2, then please at least: > > 1) Test your packages. Don't assume that the helper you use does the > right thing. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. >