> I was just about to post a big explanation...again, when I saw you had
> figured it out :-)
>
> Does anyone think the Python policy need a bit more explanation here? would
> some "use-cases" help?
I think that would be a good idea, probably. To try to avoid having too
many people asking the sam
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:15:35PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> > I see python-numeric and python-numeric-ext have versioned dependencies
> > on the python meta package. It doesn't look necessary to me, there are
> > python2.2-numeric and python2.1-numeric pac
ioned, one could upgrade python-numeric before doing a full python
upgrade... (I still have a couple of packages holding my python on 2.1.)
Hugo van der Merwe
Sorry, I'm not on the list, please CC.
Sorry, I've not checked for existing threads on this topic... will Sarge
use Python2.2 by any chance? Once this is decided, the sooner it is made
official, the sooner packages will start updating, and the faster we
will get a stable Sarge...
Specifically, I am wondering if I should go to the troub
4 matches
Mail list logo
