Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

Hello, everybody, On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:36:59AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 21 novembre 2010, vers > 16:37, Filippo Rusconi disait : > > > OK, so I may test if the content of the PYTHONPATH variable is empty > >

Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

y/plot else PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/mmass/mspy/plot:${PYTHONPATH} fi export PYTHONPATH exec python2.6 /usr/share/mmass/mmass.py ~~~ end ~~~ Is this correct ? Thanks a lot for your kind help, Ciao Filippo -- Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS - public key C78F687C Author of ``massXpert&#

Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

y/plot else PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/mmass/mspy/plot:${PYTHONPATH} fi export PYTHONPATH exec python2.6 /usr/share/mmass/mmass.py ~~~ end ~~~ Is this correct ? Thanks a lot for your kind help, Ciao Filippo -- Best regards, Filippo -- Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS -

Re: Build-Depends-Indep dependencies

ld be present for these Makefile > targets: > build, build-indep, binary, and binary-indep > > But there are no such targets in trac-bitten debian/rules file, so I > assume that some kind of autotools is used to execute/supply these > targets when debian/rules is executed. As a Win

Re: question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file

ware this way and let you know of the git repository, if you would be kind enough to give it a look before I upload it (gotta be careful). Anyway, thank you for the feedback. Best regards, Filippo -- Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS - public key C78F687C Author of

question about packaging a python-based software that ships a shared object library file

ere a location where I can learn some more ? What are the guidelines in the case I described ? Thanks for reading ! Best regards, Filippo -- Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS - public key C78F687C Author of ``massXpert'' at http://www.massxpert.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature