On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> This issue is avoidable if the repository is a Bazaar one:
But what does it solve ? The main problem with downloading the whole
history is the time taken. The only way to know the relative speed is
to measure; in my experience, with a git se
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 08 février 2009 à 21:36 -0800, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
>> > should build numpy (and scipy) without ATLAS, even if atlas is detected.
>>
>> Thanks for the tip --- I think there was some reason for this
>> conflict, but I can't r
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [David Cournapeau, 2009-02-11]
>> As a first patch, I remove the build-conflicts on atlas, while still
>> avoiding explicit linking against it; this should create exactly the
>> same package as before, without t
Hi,
Thanks to Piotr for giving me an account to svn.
As a first patch, I remove the build-conflicts on atlas, while still
avoiding explicit linking against it; this should create exactly the
same package as before, without the need for the build conflicts. I
did not want to commit directly since
Hi Piotr,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [David Cournapeau, 2009-02-09]
>> I am a developer of numpy and scipy, and I would be interested in
>> helping numpy/scipy debian packages to be better on both Debian and
>> Ubuntu.
>
> great! :-)
>
Hi,
I am a developer of numpy and scipy, and I would be interested in
helping numpy/scipy debian packages to be better on both Debian and
Ubuntu. As a user of both Debian and Ubuntu, and one of the main
developer working on build issues for numpy/scipy, I think I can be
useful :)
I looked at the
6 matches
Mail list logo
