Re: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-02-19 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-11-13 15:31:04 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: >> > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending on >> > release) >> > getmail4 (version=4,5) popcon installed ~2000 >> > getma

Re: [py3porters-devel] Python 2 in the default installation -- progress made!

2017-01-02 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2017-01-02 19:47:00 -0500, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > There was an open bug about changing the overrides (#849903) and I just > set all packages built from gpgme1.0 to "Priority: optional". > > I don't think there is any reason for the lib*-dev packages to be at > Priority: extra? I read: h

Re: [py3porters-devel] Python 2 in the default installation -- progress made!

2017-01-02 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2016-12-29 23:41:39 -0500, Stuart Prescott wrote: > one of the objectives for stretch was to reduce the number of Python 2 > packages that are installed in common scenarios, instead having the > Python 3 stack take over. The "standard task" within tasksel is a > reasonable place to look.ยน [

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 05/17/2013 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > You misunderstand. I don't think i misunderstood at all. > I'm all for having a good common environment for the team to work on. I > happen to think you suggested just about the worst one possible. I've tried > it and I find it much more compl

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 05/17/2013 01:40 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > If the team moves to full source git archives, I'll just drop the team from > all the packages I maintain. > > Scott K > > P.S. See, now the fun begins. fun, indeed. it sounds to me like you're saying: A) re: #708573 if some members of the

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 05/17/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > This came up recently on debian-python. It's a very long thread, but the > basic outcome was that, while quite a few people wanted to move away from > svn, there was very little consensus on which VCS to migrate to, whether to > include full source t

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
[dropping the bug report from the cc list] On 05/17/2013 11:49 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > We've been through this a number of times for both PAPT and DPMT. We want a > common repository for each team (not split between different VCSs). There's > been discussion about what would be needed to