Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 07/10/2013 10:30 PM, Stuart Prescott wrote: >> Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 07/08/2013 10:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: There is no policy on this either way, so there's no "mistake". >>> >>> Well, the mistake is precisely to have n

Re: Third round of advise on packaging python-csb

Interesting, the LibraryStyleGuide [1] suggests a plain `=` and the AppStyleGuide [2] suggests `:=`. (The difference of course is that `=` does delayed evaluation meaning the command is run once for every time the variable is needed, and `:=` does immediate evaluation meaning the command is run on