most of those packages (some dated) are in my personal repository.
deb-src ftp://ftp.real-time.com/linux/real-time sid custom main contrib
non-free
Push what you got, I'll post any major differences for discussion and sync
my stuff to alioth.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> (Please request the removal of pkg-turbogears on alioth once you don't
> need it any more)
>
Waiting on confirmation and then I'll submit the remove request.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-t
of us and I think it would be best to be part of a large
project.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I completed the documentation of the python-modules alioth project.
How does this new project effect existing projects like pkg-turbogears?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time
ll goes well).
This is just for core python right?
Just want to make sure I understand the thread, python package projects,
like pkg-turbogears are to remain separate?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (9
Bob Tanner real-time.com> writes:
> >> I don't think Debian should use the egg structure.
> Read and re-read the complete thread regarding .eggs in Debian and I cannot
> tell if any progress has been made.
> As "just a package maintainer" I was looking
/bugreport.cgi?bug=338276
Unofficially
deb ftp://ftp.real-time.com/linux/real-time-debpool sid custom main
deb-src ftp://ftp.real-time.com/linux/real-time-debpool sid custom main
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux
needs formencode
and Fabio contacted me about my ITP for formencode. I've been dragging my
feeting waiting for the whole .egg/.deb debate to be resolved.
I've removed the .egg stuff from the latest release, I just need to get the
directory names debian compliant.
I hope to work on it 01
is the less ugly.
Stop swinging the Josselin-clue-by-four at upstream and turn all the energy
into debian-python :-)
Is easy-deb the less ugly of the hacks?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Debian must support .egg's?
Answering the -IF- will let us move forward to the HOW.
- --
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2
Bob Tanner wrote:
>> I don't think Debian should use the egg structure. It apparently relies
>> on building a long sys.path (even though through only a single .pth
>> file);
>
> I'm not sure of how .eggs are implemented, but I'm going to cross-post
>
revious post talked about memory consumption, again bytes, kilobytes,
megabytes?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288
he ultimate goal is to debianize TurboGears, reading the above, and other
posts using the legacy site-packages (non-egg) installation will "break"
TurboGears?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (9
ur own setup.py under debian/.
Nice. I see that ability on the cdbs wiki as well.
https://wiki.duckcorp.org/DebianPackagingTutorial/CDBS
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprin
are
preferable to directories in most cases as they make Python import
processing faster.
( Rest of the comments debian-python specific)
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Key fingerpri
> If there is no way to install the package directly into site-packages
> using the provided setup.py, I think setup.py should be
> modified/ignored.
Won't this mean a total re-write of cdbs since it specifically looks for
setup.py?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sues with Linux distributions.
I'd encourage ... [Matthias] ... to join this list, and we can discuss
how this stuff should work.
I've attached Ian's email as well.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, L
erred way
to (re)distribute python modules.
Worse(?) if Debian doesn't follow this structure, other python packages may
break (their example TurboGears).
Is Debian python policy dated or wrong?
Debian moving a different direction then upstream python?
- --
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bs and I cannot seem to find the logic on where modules get
installed, is it controllable via cdbs?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1
19 matches
Mail list logo
