On 2024-05-08 10:18:27, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2024-05-08 16:08:07, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> That was the very first day I got to work on DPT packages;
>> so well yes, I did some mistakes at first;
>> and having been DM for far too long (~10 yea
On 2024-05-08 10:18:27, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2024-05-08 16:08:07, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> That was the very first day I got to work on DPT packages;
>> so well yes, I did some mistakes at first;
>> and having been DM for far too long (~10 yea
On 2024-05-08 16:08:07, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That was the very first day I got to work on DPT packages;
> so well yes, I did some mistakes at first;
> and having been DM for far too long (~10 years) I needed to retrain;
> I had so many things stuck in my queue at first.
>
> https://li
On 2024-05-08 16:11:46, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Ok I guess you want to do this one:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008768
Not really! It's a RFP, if I was going to do it, I would have renamed
that package to "ITP" and reassigned it...
a.
--
I would defend the liberty
On 2024-05-08 16:08:07, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That was the very first day I got to work on DPT packages;
> so well yes, I did some mistakes at first;
> and having been DM for far too long (~10 years) I needed to retrain;
> I had so many things stuck in my queue at first.
>
> https://li
On 2024-05-08 16:11:46, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Ok I guess you want to do this one:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008768
Not really! It's a RFP, if I was going to do it, I would have renamed
that package to "ITP" and reassigned it...
a.
--
I would defend the liberty
Hi,
I'm working on updating the python-invoke package and see you've done
two uploads on the package:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1491303/accepted-python-invoke-200-11-source-into-unstable/
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1491393/accepted-python-invoke-200-12-source-into-unstable/
So, first
Control: retitle -1 ITP: web-cache -- Simple Python key-value storage backed up
by sqlite3 database
On 2024-04-30 12:26:05, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> * Package name: python3-web-cache
Actually, py2dsp makes a package named `web-cache` for this, which seems
a tad too generic. Thoughts?
--
On
On 2022-09-22 19:43:24, Jeroen Ploemen wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:35:12 -0400
> Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
>> I think the simplest solution is not to rewrite the launcher, but to
>> rename it. So in debian/rules, you would simply do:
>>
>> override_dh_auto_in
On 2022-09-22 17:03:24, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:56:05AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>> https://github.com/git-multimail/git-multimail/issues/221#issuecomment-1245009306
>>> (To avoid bring noisy for upstream, i just recorded it in a issue)
On 2022-09-18 11:10:24, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 05:32:33PM +0100, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>I've done a quick review of the 1.6.0 package on salsa as of commit
>>d5bd184a1cf73b752f80dea46d8080493a5e663b.
[...]
>>Also, I didn&
On 2022-09-15 17:32:33, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've done a quick review of the 1.6.0 package on salsa as of commit
> d5bd184a1cf73b752f80dea46d8080493a5e663b.
[...]
> Also, I didn't quite follow the work on the test cases, but why did you
> replace pep8 by
Hi!
I've done a quick review of the 1.6.0 package on salsa as of commit
d5bd184a1cf73b752f80dea46d8080493a5e663b.
It looks like there's some leftover stuff in debian/copyright, i would
remove this:
modified debian/copyright
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ Format:
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/
On 2022-06-07 18:46:37, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've read more into versioneer, and it turns out with the way it works
> you can't simply remove versioneer.py from the source, much less
> _version.py. Therefore, I'm excluding _version.py in d/copyright, then
> replacing it with the much
On 2022-06-07 15:44:28, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:47:33AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2022-06-07 07:11:15, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > As far as I understand, versioneer (or the _version.py generated by
>> > it) uses a wh
On 2022-06-06 23:42:19, Ben Westover wrote:
> Here's another note:
>
> On 6/6/22 10:49 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> * i'm really not sure I like that C binary to fetch the keyboard
>>layout... surely there must be a more pythonic way of doing this? i
>>
On 2022-06-07 07:11:15, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:42:53PM -0400, Ben Westover wrote:
>> > > _version.py is not a copy of versioneer, it's *generated* by versioneer.
>> > > However, there is versioneer.py in the root directory, which is. I'll
>> > > exclude that f
On 2022-06-06 22:42:53, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello Antoine,
>
I am aware of this failure and have reported it upstream. For now, I'll
disable the offending test.
>>>
>>> After doing that, I discovered that almost all of the tests are faulty
>>> (at least on Python 3.10), so I've disabled
On 2022-06-06 21:10:31, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello again,
> Some corrections to my previous message:
>
>> As for how it's installed, I believe that's handled by the upstream setup.py:
>> data_files=[
>> ("share/bumblebee-status/themes", glob.glob("themes/*.json")),
>> ("shar
I'm working on uploading v22 right now.
--
In a racist society it is not enough to be non-racist, we must be antiracist.
- Angela Davis
On 2022-03-18 22:22:25, Bo YU wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:30 PM Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
> Oops, my bad. I forget to cc you indeed :-(.
No problem. :)
>> By default, the BTS doesn't include the original submitter when you only
>> write to the bug report...
&g
On 2022-03-18 16:45:25, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:44 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> > Sorry again. I recheck the #1007025 [0], it should be RFP tag.
>> > This is my misspelt in the first request email.
>> > So I think I can go to to work it :-)
>>
>> OMG you're right! i gue
On 2021-02-09 08:23:27, stefa...@debian.org wrote:
> Hi Antoine (2021.02.08_16:53:57_+)
>> I have more cycles for this again, and see the 1.0 release still hasn't
>> hit unstable... need help? :)
>
> Uploaded.
I suspect it might be too late for the freeze (in three days?) but we'll
see, I gues
On 2021-02-05 04:41:37, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Antoine (2021.02.05_02:13:56_+)
>> I can't figure out how to update dateparser to 1.0.0. I am battling
>> pytest and deps and failing. Seems like we'd need to package
>> hijri_converter as a dependency, and fix the build so it doesn't require
>
On 2021-02-05 04:41:37, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Antoine (2021.02.05_02:13:56_+)
>> I can't figure out how to update dateparser to 1.0.0. I am battling
>> pytest and deps and failing. Seems like we'd need to package
>> hijri_converter as a dependency, and fix the build so it doesn't require
>
|
+----------+
Unpack source
-
Format: 3.0 (quilt)
Source: dateparser
Binary: python3-dateparser
Architecture: all
Version: 1.0.0-1
Maintainer: Debian Python Team
Uploaders: Antoine Beaupré , Andrey
On 2020-05-11 22:27:57, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Antoine, you did not push the upstream branch. please do so, in order
> to keep the repo consistent
Oops, sorry about that, somehow I forgot that one...
This is one of my problems with the multi-branch layout: I always forgot
either upstream or pristin
Same, with PAPT, please.
Thanks.
A.
On 2017-12-30 09:46:28, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been packaging stuff in Debian for a while and I'm often packaging
> dependencies that would benefit from being under the DPMT umbrella.
>
> My alioth login is "anarcat".
>
> I have read read the po
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Beaupré
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: internetarchive
Version : 1.8.1
Upstream Author : Jacob M. Johnson
* URL : https://github.com/jjjake/internetarchive
* License : AGPL 3
On 2017-09-28 19:59:12, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:27:20AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > And moving Python 3 packages to /usr/bin/sphinx3-build or something like
>> > that will mean diverging from upstream (see below).
>>
>> Note that
On 2017-09-28 01:03:27, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Antoine, and thanks for the detailed mail!
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 06:29:05PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> We just had a short conversation on the #debian-devel IRC channel
>> regarding the upcoming Python 2 EOL,
Hi!
[please keep me in CC, I am not on the list]
We just had a short conversation on the #debian-devel IRC channel
regarding the upcoming Python 2 EOL, in the context of the Sphinx
packages.
As a packager of Python tools (and an upstream), I find the current
situation a little confusing. My Pyth
32 matches
Mail list logo
