Re: Packaging a Python program

2001-10-08 Thread Anthony Roach
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > Anthony Roach wrote: > Exactly. With Python 2.1 you will have to make a 2.1 compatible .deb > package. OK. > Make a suggestion, a recommendation is too hard as some users might want to > stick > &g

Re: Packaging a Python program

2001-10-05 Thread Anthony Roach
tall both, so the user can use scons with either python. Perhaps I should put this in my control file for scons: Depends: python-scons|python2-scons Recommended: python-scons, python2-scons Or maybe Suggests? I'm not sure either of these will really do what I want. -- Homepage: http://

Re: Packaging a Python program

2001-10-04 Thread Anthony Roach
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 09:05:07PM -0500, Anthony Roach wrote: > 4) libSCons (why put the -python on? There isn't ever going to be a non-python >version if libSCons). Well, after some trial and error, I realized I can't name a binary package libSCons, because the name has to b

Packaging a Python program

2001-10-04 Thread Anthony Roach
sion of python on the system) 4) libSCons (why put the -python on? There isn't ever going to be a non-python version if libSCons). Any feedback is greatly appreciated. -- Homepage: http://www.electriceyeball.com Email: Anthony Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http: