Re: Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:53:07AM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: >> But it is OK to drop 2.1/2.2 support for packages that nothing depends on? > > -1 > if -1: print "parsed as true" else: print "parsed a

Re: Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:27:16 +0200 > Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I wonder how long source packages that build binary packages for >> multiple versions (2.{1,2,3}) should con

Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

? Regards, Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Latein ist das humanoide Äquivalent zu

Re: Python policy update

ons, a new section on bytecompilation, > Maybe a pointer to dh_python would be good in this section. Regards -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4

How to handle C++ linked interpreters?

or debian-devel, as I'm not on debian-python) -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 -