Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the psyco package, as I no longer use the package and
cannot maintain it properly anymore.
Due to lack of upstream support, maybe the package should be removed from
Debian altogether, as supporting python >> 2.5 will require significant eff
bian.org/p/psyco.html
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/psyco-doc.html
--
Alexandre Fayolle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: htt
hon*/site-
packages/logilab/__init__.py*, and issues a warning if there are other stuff in
the directory : this will stop packages installed under that tree from working
without deleting the files themselves (enabling the administrator to find out
what's broken with that installation).
ist even though this version is
requested debian/control (or in some other place if you chose the other
way without XS-Python-Version).
I have to admit that I am a bit disapointed by this, to say the least.
Why are we shipping python2.5 in etch if we don't ship the python
extension modu
hon installations (pyx upstream has "import site; print
> site.here" in SVN but that doesn't work in python >= 2.4).
import sys
import os.path
print os.path.join(sys.prefix, 'lib', 'python'+sys.version[:3])
--
Alexandre Fayolle
Package: python2.5
Version: 2.5-3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
In /usr/share/doc/python2.5/README.Debian,
"""
distutils can be found in the python2.5-dev package. Development files
like the python library or Makefiles can be found in the python2.5-dev
package in /usr/lib/python2.5/config.
"""
sh
2.3), python (<<2.4) (generated by dh_python).
Am I expected to upload an unchanged 0.2.0-3 package so that it will get
rebuilt with python2.4 as the default python version, or is something
going to happen automatically, for instance a binary only NMU ?
--
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:06:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Alexandre Fayolle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060801 17:06]:
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:54:27PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > Le mar 1 août 2006 16:41, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> &
t; learn ;)
Yes, ReST is nice, and can be parsed using python-docutils.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services
Informatique sc
n is built with Numeric and
won't work with numpy. Work in in progress in getting a more recent
version of scipy in Debian.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
Développement logiciel su
Package: pyro
Version: 3.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi Cédric,
The pyro package currently does not follow the new Python policy
(http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy), but strangely no bug
has been filed against it so far.
The attached patch fixes this, as well as the multiple
currently in the NEW queue, waiting for
the ftp-master's approval, so you just need to wait a little bit for the
package to hit the archive.
Thanks for packaging Qwt.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.log
Hi everyone,
I'll be attending Europython next week. If anyone else involved with
python packaging in Debian is there, I'll be glad to meet them.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/
Package: python2.4-gnome2-extras
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: makes package uninstalable on sid
Hi,
The python-gtk2 package has been updated to the new Python policy, and
therefore the
python2.4-gtk2 package is now a virtual package, on which no versionned
dependencies should
ickly in case the package
breaks something else.
Anyone knowledgeable is welcome to verify the patch and upload it. If
noone does so, I'll upload the NMU next monday, possibly with comments received
by mail included.
Cheers, I've got to run, now.
--
Alexandre Fayolle
Package: python2.3-tables
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 7.2
Hi,
python2.3-tables is uninstallable on a sid distribution, because it depends on
python2.3-numarray (>= 1.5). With the new python policy, python2.3-numarray is
a virtual
package provided by python-numarray.
A
Apologies for the French subject line in the previous mail. I'm
resending in case it caused it to be trapped by spam filters.
I would be glad to join the python-modules packaging team.
My alioth login is afayolle, and for those who dwell there, my irc nick
is agurney.
Thanks,
--
Alex
Hi everyone
I would be glad to join the python-modules packaging team.
My alioth login is afayolle, and for those who dwell there, my irc nick
is agurney.
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http
just not true. Python is smart enough not to use the .pyc if the
version used to produce it is not the one which is used. The problem
only exists for python extensions, but pure python modules have no
problem with this.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
#x27;t catch a lot more files (optimized
bytecode is not that common), but does not involve a very high overhead.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the python-xml[1] package.
The package description is:
The Python/XML distribution contains the basic tools required for
processing XML data using the Python programming language, assembled
into one easy-to-install package. The distribut
ink, or an
executable such as /usr/bin/python-compileall) so that the packages can
avoid depending on a versioned python version when they are version
independent.
Thanks for your feedback.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France).
signature.asc
Descriptio
rg/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=python-xml
[3] http://xbel.sourceforge.net/
--
Alexandre Fayolle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
swers,
--
Alexandre Fayolle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:35:42PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:53:07AM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> >> But it is OK to drop 2.1/2.2 support for packages that nothing depends
mer using AIX 4.3, and
which required my program to work with python2.1, and I was *very* happy
to find python2.1 and libraries on my debian box to test my work.
--
Alexandre Fayolle
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
Développem
if people think this is
more urgent, please tell me if you want to sponsor the upload today, and
I'll give you the URL where you can dowload the source package for
python-xml and python-unit.
> * change Build-Depends from python-xml to python2.3-xml for the moment.
This will
python2.2, python-docutils
python2.2 will be installed, so is python-docutils, but not
python-textwrap nor python2.2-xmlbase because python2.3 is there.
The result is a malfunctionning python2.2-so-and-so, unless the packager
manually adds python-textwrap and python2.2-xml dependencies, but th
d
modules will be used on import.
Now this has some unpleasant consequences:
* python no longer has a way of seeing if the .pyc is up to date
* I think this screws up the exception reporting routines in python
Maybe this could be handled with symlinks?
--
Alexandre Fayolle
LOGI
ies on packages which are ot
available on all python versions. For instance python-docutils needs
python-xmlbase and python-difflib. python-xmlbase exists for python2.1
and 2.2 but not 2.3, and difflib exists for 2.1, but not 2.2 or 2.3. How
should the dependencies be written ?
--
Alexandre Fayolle
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
Développement logiciel avancé - Intelligence Artificielle - Formations
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:41:09AM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:26:57AM +0200, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
>
> How big is this documentation? Is it big enough to have a -doc package?
> If so, you might consider just building the -doc on your own system and
> l
gestion welcome.
--
Alexandre Fayolle
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
Développement logiciel avancé - Intelligence Artificielle - Formations
32 matches
Mail list logo
