Re: Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

2025-01-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 03:23:50PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2025-01-19 14:44, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > You can achieve that with: > > PY3VERS=$(PY3DEF) > > +PY3RANGE=$(shell echo $(PY3DEF) | awk 'BEGIN { FS="." }; { print $$1 > > "." $$2 "-" $$1 "." $$2 + 1 }') > > > > + dh_python3 -

Bug#1093278: paraview needs a stricter python dependency

2025-01-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: paraview Version: 5.13.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 python3-paraview https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/paraview Issues preventing migration: ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for paraview/5.13.2+dfsg-1: amd64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference

Bug#1087905: pytango/experimental FTBFS with Python 3.13 as supported version

2024-11-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: pytango Version: 10.0.0-1~exp1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: Santiago Ruano Rincón , Debian Boost Team , debian-python@lists.debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=pytango&ver=10.0.0-1~exp1%2Bb1 ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 189, i

Generating stricter dependencies on python3-protobuf rdeps

2023-03-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, the problem in #1031716/#1028371 is as follows: 1. python3-protobuf and protobuf-compiler are both built from src:protobuf 2. packages using python3-protobuf (e.g. python3-bernhard) ship files that were generated with protobuf-compiler during their build (e.g. /usr/lib/python3/dist

Re: Bug#1022526: python-ssdeep: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class must subclass Command

2022-11-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:04:04AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Helmut (2022.11.04_11:36:41_+0200) > > And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs. > > Updating it to 3.4.1 might. It includes this commit: > https://github.com/DinoTools/python-ssdeep/comm

Re: Bug#949312: txsocksx: should this package be removed?

2020-02-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 08:25:35PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 6:37 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 09:20:31PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:51 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at

Re: MBF for deprecating Python2 usage

2017-08-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:57:01PM -0400, Matthias Klose wrote: > While at DebCamp, Stefano Rivera and I sat down to analyze what needs to be > done > to deprecate Python2 usage within the distribution. It might not be possible > to > drop Python2 for the next release, but there are still too ma

Re: MBF for deprecating Python2 usage

2017-08-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:57:01PM -0400, Matthias Klose wrote: > While at DebCamp, Stefano Rivera and I sat down to analyze what needs to be > done > to deprecate Python2 usage within the distribution. It might not be possible > to > drop Python2 for the next release, but there are still too ma

Re: Bug#653650: ipython: Please depend on "python (>= 2.7) | python-argparse"

2012-01-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
> On Friday, December 30, 2011, Julian Taylor wrote: > > > > tags 653650 + wontfix > > thanks > > > > On 12/30/2011 12:29 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Source: ipython > > > Version: 0.11-2 > > > Severity:

Re: python-xml 0.6.3 : seeking for sponsorship

2001-01-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On 22 Jan 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Hi, Hi Jérôme, > I put a new version of python-xml at > > http://jerome.marant.free.fr/debian/unstable > > and I'm seeking for a sponsor. The last upload was done by Adrian Bunk > and I would be please to be sponsored by

Re: Seeking for sponsorship

2000-11-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > Since I'm waiting in the NM queue (DAM stage), I'm seeking for sponsorship > > on two python packages named: > > > > - python-unit > > - python-xml (adopted) > > > > These packages have been checked by Joel Rosdahl, a valuable Debian > > Develop