Re: Bug#128531: tmda

2002-02-20 Thread Adam McKenna
in python policy. If you want to set forth a policy, it's usually a good idea to provide a rationale for it, or at least say how things like this will be implemented. If the policy needs updating, then please update it. Thanks, --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#128531: tmda

2002-02-20 Thread Adam McKenna
;s impossible to support more than just the currently installed versions anyway. Once a new version of python is added, the package will still need to be updated or at least reinstalled to compile the modules for the new version. --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#128531: tmda

2002-02-20 Thread Adam McKenna
ide of the package management system. --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#128531: tmda

2002-02-20 Thread Adam McKenna
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 08:06:35AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Adam McKenna writes: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:55:59AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > reopen 128531 > > > thanks > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam D. McKenna) &

Re: Bug#128531: tmda

2002-02-19 Thread Adam McKenna
dummy package? Any policy that forces me to compile .py{c,o} object files in my postinst is braindead. Then I also have to delete them in purge/postrm, and the packaging system knows nothing about them. The dummy package is there so that people already running tmda will get the new version automat