On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Adam Heath writes:
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > > Nevertheless your style of response is, ehh, not nice. Why should he
> > > assume that you would work on the packages, if you did not work
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Nevertheless your style of response is, ehh, not nice. Why should he
> assume that you would work on the packages, if you did not work on
> them in the last four or five weeks?
If no work needs to be done, then why do anything?
Sorry for the large cc, but it is about time that debian had a unified policy
on these package names.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Okay. Note that java policy states that "Libraries packages must be named
> lib-XXX-java."
I think the java policy is wrong. Why should java be any
3 matches
Mail list logo
