Bug#1116608: RFS: python-awkward/2.8.9-1 -- manipulate JSON-like data with NumPy-like idioms

2025-10-17 Thread Aryan Karamtoth
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-awkward": * Package name : python-awkward Version : 2.8.9-1 Upstream contact : [fill in

Request for adding me to the debian python team

2025-10-17 Thread Diwa Tomy
Greetings, I would like to contribute towards the debian python packages and I would like to join the team to maintain my current package within the team and help maintain other packages i can. My salsa login is : serval123 (https://salsa.debian.org/serval123) I have read and accept the team's p

review for python-atom/0.11.0-1

2025-10-17 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Alexander, I took a look at the python-atom package, up for sponsorship in the Python team: * diff between orig tarball from uscan and pristine-tar branch (output from tardiff -m -s): + PKG-INFO + atom.egg-info + atom.egg-info/PKG-INFO + atom.egg-info/SOURCES.txt + atom.egg-info/de

Re: Bug#1117897: pygobject FTBFS with Python 3.14: TestReferences AssertionErrors

2025-10-17 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 at 11:24:48 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: pygobject fails to build with Python 3.14 as an available version. ... I think it has been fixed in a new upstream version, but that needs to be checked. Please note that we are not yet ready to upgrade pygobject to its latest upst

Re: Bug#1117897: pygobject FTBFS with Python 3.14: TestReferences AssertionErrors

2025-10-17 Thread Simon McVittie
Version: 3.54.3-1 On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 at 18:03:19 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 at 11:24:48 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: pygobject fails to build with Python 3.14 as an available version. ... I think it has been fixed in a new upstream version, but that needs to be checked.

Re: review for python-can/4.6.1-1

2025-10-17 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Thank you Carl for working on this Le sam. 4 oct. 2025 à 12:35, Jeroen Ploemen a écrit : > * rules: is that (manual) licensecheck target still useful enough to > keep around in the day and age of CI/licenserecon? It looks like something from an old CDBS template; I prefer licenserecon too, but

review for python-can/4.6.1-1

2025-10-17 Thread Jeroen Ploemen
hi Carl, I took a look at the python-can package, up for sponsorship in the Python team: * copyright: missing info (copyright holder) for: can/interfaces/ixxat/exceptions.py:5:Copyright (C) 2019 Marcel Kanter * manpages: example commands use 'python' (= long gone python v2) rather than 'py