Re: Bug#791635: python-policy: Suggest conventional namespacing for Python modules' source packages

Control: retitle -1 python-policy: Suggest conventional namespacing for Python modules' source packages Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/cpython-team/python3-defaults/-/merge_requests/19 Control: tags -1 + patch On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 15:07:35 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: On Fri,

Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library

On Tue, 01 Jul 2025 at 10:42:19 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: Am 01.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Aryan Karamtoth: ... So my question is should I rename the source field to “python3- packagename” too or will it cause any conflicts? The source package ("Source:") should not be prefixed with "python3

Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library

On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 09:02:24AM +, Aryan Karamtoth wrote: I read somewhere in some documentation given by Debian Python Team and they said that “python-packagename” stands for a library in Python 2 and “python3-packagename” must be the convention for python 3 librarie. That's about bin

Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library

Hi Carsten, just went through the link you sent and noticed that a lot of the packages inside just have the name in the form “packagename” But my wnpp ITP has the package name as “python3-packagename”. Should I modify the ITP request to read it as “python-packagename” too? a simple “packagename

Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library

Hi Carsten, just went through the link you sent and noticed that a lot of the packages inside just have the name in the form “packagename” But my wnpp ITP has the package name as “python3-packagename”. Should I modify the ITP request to read it as “python-packagename” too? a simple “packagenam

Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library

I read somewhere in some documentation given by Debian Python Team and they said that “python-packagename” stands for a library in Python 2 and “python3-packagename” must be the convention for python 3 librarie. From: Carsten Schoenert Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Re: Need help with naming scheme in debian/control for python library

Hello Aryan, Am 01.07.25 um 09:59 schrieb Aryan Karamtoth: ... So my question is should I rename the source field to “python3- packagename” too or will it cause any conflicts? the common sense is to prefix the source package with "python" without any version numbers. And the bin package for