Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ?

2025-02-23 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Dirk, On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:37:37PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > Hi Emanuel, > > Thanks for the prompt reply! > [...] > | Seems very similar to basemap[0] > | > | [0] https://sources.debian.org/src/basemap/1.4.1-1/ > > I may have been unclear in what I was looking for. If I rea

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-23 Thread James Addison
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 18:24, James Addison wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > I've built matplotlib 3.10 from experimental (including the no-PFB > patch from the exp2 upload) successfully and have been able to use > that to rebuild the astropy-doc package; as a result I think I've > found additional sou

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-23 Thread James Addison
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 at 23:49, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > James : do you want to help ;-) You can merge your own MR if you feel > confident. >https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/matplotlib/-/merge_requests/6 Thank you, Alexandre and Nilesh! I think my MR seems li

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-23 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 23/02/25 05:19, Alexandre Detiste wrote: There was a cyclic bootstrap relationship between this and ... Pandas (?) in the Numpy transition that was handled swiftly in the Pandas side but I thing we are a now far enough in Numpy transition the reopload 3.8 to unstable with the accumulated fi