Re: renewed python-sigstore packaging work

Simon Josefsson writes: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-tuf I have uploaded 5.1.0-2 to unstable, however I would appreciate review of python-tuf since I'm new to python packaging. My main concern is about debian/tests/ and if there are better approaches? > https://salsa.

Re: Bug#1090952: ITP: python-rfc8785 -- Pure-Python JSON Canonicalization Scheme (Python library)

Hi, I'd appreciate review of this package too: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-rfc8785 Pardon the incorrect Subject line of the ITP bug report! Cut'n'paste error... /Simon Simon Josefsson writes: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Simon Josefsson > X-Debbugs

Bug#1090952: ITP: python-sigstore-rekor-types -- Python models for Rekor's API types

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-rfc8785 Version : 0.1.4 Upstream Author : William Woodruff, Anders Rundgren, et al * URL : https://github.com/trai

Re: Bug#1090897: ITP: python-sigstore-protobuf-specs -- Python bindings for Sigstore's protocol buffer (protobuf) specs

Hi, I would appreciate packaging review of: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-sigstore-protobuf-specs Some questions/concerns: - Same concern about using PyPI tarballs as for the other packages, some files are missing compared to upstream's GitHub repository. Maybe this

Re: Bug#1090918: ITP: python-sigstore-rekor-types -- Python models for Rekor's API types

Hi again, I would appreciate packaging review of: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-sigstore-rekor-types Some questions/concerns: - Autopkgtest fail, it appears to be looking for a module called 'sigstore_rekor_types' but the installed name is 'rekor_types'. I don't unde

Re: Bug#1090902: ITP: python-betterproto -- better Protobuf / gRPC generator & library

Hi again, I would appreciate packaging review of 'betterproto': https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-betterproto Some questions/concerns: - The dh_auto_test call fail, but debian/rules mask this error so the build completes. Does anyone understand the error message? Is 'py

Re: Bug#1090912: ITP: python-grpclib -- Pure-Python gRPC implementation for asyncio

Hi Python Team, I have prepared packaging of 'grpclib' and I'm new to Python packaging, so I would appreciate open minded review of how this is packaged: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-grpclib Please bring up stylistic concerns, for me to learn. I plan to upload this to NE

Bug#1090918: ITP: python-sigstore-rekor-types -- Python models for Rekor's API types

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-sigstore-rekor-types Version : 0.0.18 Upstream Author : William Woodruff, et al * URL : https://github.com/trailof

Bug#1090912: ITP: python-grpclib -- Pure-Python gRPC implementation for asyncio

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-grpclib Version : 2.0.0b7 Upstream Author : Vladimir Magamedov, et al * URL : https://github.com/vmagamedov/grpcli

Bug#1090902: ITP: python-betterproto -- better Protobuf / gRPC generator & library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-betterproto Version : 2.0.0b7 Upstream Author : Daniel G. Taylor * URL : https://github.com/danielgtaylor/python-b

Bug#1090897: ITP: python-sigstore-protobuf-specs -- Python bindings for Sigstore's protocol buffer (protobuf) specs

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-sigstore-protobuf-specs Version : 0.3.3 Upstream Author : The Sigstore Authors * URL : https://github.com/sigstore

Re: Python 3.13 addition as a supported Python version started

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 03:22:57AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:53:42PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 01:58:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > [...] > > > * spyder: #1088068/#1089054. > > > > I'm struggling with this one; I've asked at > > h