Re: Request to join the Python Debian team

2024-10-08 Thread souravbhattacharya
Hello Soren, Thank you for your message. I’ve read through the team policy and apologize for not indicating this earlier. I accept the terms and look forward to moving forward with the team. Regards, Sourav Bhattacharya  9 Oct 2024, 07:29 by so...@debian.org: > Sourav, > > Pleased to make your

Re: Request to join the Python Debian team

2024-10-08 Thread Soren Stoutner
Sourav, Pleased to make your acquaintance. Please read over the team policy and indicate that you accept it; https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/ policy.rst On Tuesday, October 8, 2024 11:02:50 AM MST souravbhattacha...@tutamail.com wrote: > Hello Debian Pytho

Request to join the Debian Python team

2024-10-08 Thread Jeff
Hi, I am a DD (jjr) and would like to join the Debian Python team. I've been in the Perl team for many years, but am in the process of transcribing the packages for which I am upstream due to better gtk-4 support in Python. Regards Jeff OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital s

Request to join the Python Debian team

2024-10-08 Thread souravbhattacharya
Hello Debian Python Team, I hope this message finds you well. My name is Sourav Bhattacharya, and I’m eager to contribute to Debian by becoming a part of the Debian Python Team. As an aspiring data science and machine learning professional, I’ve been focusing on improving my Python skills and

Re: Bug#1084600: mono: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13

2024-10-08 Thread Antoine Le Gonidec
> In this case the fix is straightforward. Nowadays you can safely > assume Python 3.3 or newer, and therefore you can replace "import > pipes" with "import shlex" and "pipes.quote" with "shlex.quote"; that > seems to be all that this script needs. Thanks for the easy fix suggestion, if I can not

Re: Bug#1084600: mono: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13

2024-10-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 06:31:17PM +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > My first step is going to check if I can simply drop this vendored > boringssl source (with a bit of luck it is not required for anything > really important). > > If I can not do that I might have to find a way to patch it to dr