Hi Timo,
Am Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:08:51PM +0100 schrieb Timo Röhling:
> I guess the motivation behind the weak collaboration model is that some
> packages have hidden "gotchas", which a casual team uploader might not know.
> For instance, pygit2 is one of multiple libgit2 language bindings which
Hi Scott,
Am Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:54:01PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> It's self-induced. I mean if it's demotivating to have people point out that
> you didn't follow the policy, then you can solve that all by yourself by
> following the policy. If I take your argument to its logical c
Hi Andreas (2024.02.27_08:05:44_+)
> I did what I usually do in those teams: I dedicated quite some time in
> team wide bug hunting. That way I squashed about 50 bugs on packages
> where I was not in Uploaders.
Thank you for doing this work. I've come across a number of DPT bugs
where you've
On February 27, 2024 11:42:33 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 2/27/24 19:32, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I suspect that packages will be removed from team maintenance as a result
>> though and I think that's a bad idea.
>
>If a package isn't in the team, any DD can ask for permission from the
On 2/27/24 19:32, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I suspect that packages will be removed from team maintenance as a result
though and I think that's a bad idea.
If a package isn't in the team, any DD can ask for permission from the
maintainer before an upload. So, what's the difference, with a packag
On 2024-02-27 03:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packages
from the Blends teams to DPT. I was ha
Andreas Tille writes:
> Since I consider the current situation as demotivating for newcomers
> as well as long standing contributors I would like to suggest to drop
> this "weak statement of collaboration" option from policy. I've attached
> an according patch to the team policy[5]. I'm fine wit
Good day,
As I met "pollo" this morning on OFTC after inquiring about helping out
with the adoption of virtualenvwrapper or researching more into the state
of packaging pyenv in Debian, he suggested a good starting point would be
to read https://deb.li/PyPolicy which I had not until now and then
On February 27, 2024 2:27:35 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
>>> the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science pac
Hi Carles (2024.02.26_00:00:48_+)
> The first one includes, in top_level.txt:
> debian
> ping3
>
> And the second one:
> build
> debian
> ping3
>
> Where "ping3" is the expected module. "debian" is there because of the
> debian/ directory (I'm super sure, and AFAIK should not be there!) and
>
While perfectly understanding the weak collaboration model reasoning, I've
still always found DPT as uploader and not maintainer rather absurd TBH. The
current go to tool (as I understand it) for python packaging, py2dsp, also
creates an initial packaging with team in uploaders section and the p
On 2024-02-27 15:15, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Though indeed, I don't
> think it's reasonable to have a package in the team, but with strong
> ownership. I believe that we should either have a package in the team,
> or not. Period.
I'm in favour of that change, too, but I can live with the current s
Hi,
* Andreas Tille [2024-02-27 09:05]:
Since I consider the current situation as demotivating for
newcomers as well as long standing contributors I would like to
suggest to drop this "weak statement of collaboration" option from
policy.
+1 from me.
I guess the motivation behind the weak co
* Thomas Goirand [2024-02-27 15:15]:
So I'm 100% with you for the removal of this policy.
+1 to everything.
Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packag
On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packages
from the Blends teams to DPT. I was happy
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packages
from the Blends teams to DPT. I was happy with this move since it makes
sense.
Re
17 matches
Mail list logo
