Dear Metchilde,
thanks for reply.
On 2023-09-17 08:51 Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> Am 17.09.23 um 08:35 schrieb c.bu...@posteo.jp:
> > Might it just be that "uscan" doesn't run every day on the Debian
> > servers? :)
> >
> > I tried to reproduce it on my local machine. But there the new
> > vers
Hello Christian,
Am 17.09.23 um 08:35 schrieb c.bu...@posteo.jp:
Might it just be that "uscan" doesn't run every day on the Debian
servers? :)
I tried to reproduce it on my local machine. But there the new version
is recognized without problems.
You can find the right result under
https://q
Hello Christian,
Am 17.09.23 um 08:35 schrieb c.bu...@posteo.jp:
Might it just be that "uscan" doesn't run every day on the Debian
servers? :)
I tried to reproduce it on my local machine. But there the new version
is recognized without problems.
You can find the right result under
https://q
Might it just be that "uscan" doesn't run every day on the Debian
servers? :)
I tried to reproduce it on my local machine. But there the new version
is recognized without problems.
$ uscan --verbose
uscan info: uscan (version 2.21.3+deb11u1) See uscan(1) for help
uscan info: Scan watch files in
Hello together,
do I get it right that the syntax of the debain/watch file do use regex?
https://repo .*/v?(\d.*)@ARCHIVE_EXT@
When an application do use version tages like "v1.4.0" and based on my
knowledge and experiments on regex101.com this won't work. Am I right?
There is also a captur
On September 16, 2023 4:48:46 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 9/15/23 14:03, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Why did you hijack this from the Python team instead of just working with the
>> existing maintainers to update the existing packages from the new upstream
>> location?
>>
>> Scott K
>
>Tha
On 9/15/23 14:03, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Why did you hijack this from the Python team instead of just working with the
existing maintainers to update the existing packages from the new upstream
location?
Scott K
Thanks for replying to the original question ... :)
If the current maintainer was
Source: pydantic
Version: 1.10.4-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
I would like to have pydantic updated to the latest 2.x major release,
because rstcheck depends on it.
The 2.x API has some breakin
8 matches
Mail list logo