> Am 20.09.22 um 16:13 schrieb Emanuele Rocca:
> > Salsa CI is useful because it automatically performs binary/source builds,
> > arm64 crossbuilds, and it runs various pretty important tests such as
> > lintian,
> > piuparts, reproducible build testing, and more. It also runs autopkgtest in
> > L
Hi,
Am 20.09.22 um 16:13 schrieb Emanuele Rocca:
Salsa CI is useful because it automatically performs binary/source builds,
arm64 crossbuilds, and it runs various pretty important tests such as lintian,
piuparts, reproducible build testing, and more. It also runs autopkgtest in
LXC.
quite most
On 2022-09-18 11:10:24, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 05:32:33PM +0100, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>I've done a quick review of the 1.6.0 package on salsa as of commit
>>d5bd184a1cf73b752f80dea46d8080493a5e663b.
[...]
>>Also, I didn't quite follow the work on the test cases,
Hi Sandro,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:31:14AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> the way i worded my initial question was so that you could list the
> reasons that make it so useful, in detail: so would you like to do?
Salsa CI is useful because it automatically performs binary/source builds,
arm64 cros
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:33 AM Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> On 19/09 02:14, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > what would the team get out of doing this?
>
> The way I see it, CI on Salsa is so useful that it should be enabled by
> default unless there are good reasons not to.
the way i worded my initial questio
Dear all
I'm working with Claudius Heine (cmhe) and would like to join the DPT
to help maintain packages; currently I'm interested in packages related
to the TPM (tpm2-pytss) and cryptography (python-cryptography) but I
may get involved with other topics in the future.
My Salsa account is mlegner
Hi Sandro,
On 19/09 02:14, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> what would the team get out of doing this?
The way I see it, CI on Salsa is so useful that it should be enabled by
default unless there are good reasons not to.
ciao,
Emanuele
7 matches
Mail list logo
