On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 19:08 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I believe that ci.debian.net checks packages against packages in
> experimental (see
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/spyder/unstable/amd64/ for example),
> so it may be that the work is already done for us; what I don't know,
> though, i
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:28:36PM +0200, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le jeudi 02 juin 2022 à 10:28 -0400, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
> > > I would suggest ratt-rebuilding all reverse dependencies. Could
> > > that be
> > > done?
> >
> > there order of thousands rdeps, i dont think it's fair to ask
Hi Alec!
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 12:58:44PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> This issue was started on debian-devel. However, this list is perhaps a
> better choice (?)
>
> I try handle a package which installs a partly compiled,
> architecture-dependent python module. That is, besides s
Dear list,
This issue was started on debian-devel. However, this list is perhaps a
better choice (?)
I try handle a package which installs a partly compiled,
architecture-dependent python module. That is, besides some normal
python files it also contains a compiled, architecture-dependent so
Dear list,
This issue was started on debian-devel. However, this list is perhaps a
better choice (?)
I try handle a package which installs a partly compiled,
architecture-dependent python module. That is, besides some normal
python files it also contains a compiled, architecture-dependent so
5 matches
Mail list logo
