Re: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

2022-02-05 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I'd like other python team member's opinion on this, and I'm not eager > to maintain that legacy package, as I tend to not want to maintain > obsolete software. Still, I can do the initial work of creating it. i wouldnt expect much maintenance needed tho: 0.8.4 is essentially dead upstream, so i

Re: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

2022-02-05 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Nilesh Patra wrote on 05/02/2022 at 20:23:44+0100: > [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 00BAE74B343369F1 created at > 2022-02-05T20:23:44+0100 using RSA]] > On 2/6/22 12:20 AM, Julian Gilbey wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >>> On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian G

Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0

2022-02-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: lintian Version: 2.111.0 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org I just ran into several Python packages that install modules with version number 0.0.0 because of some issue with their setup.py scripts. I just did the following on my testing system: lz4cat /var/

Re: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

2022-02-05 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/6/22 12:20 AM, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: [...] _mistune.py within the Debian package, and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune" (see /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nb

Re: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

2022-02-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > [...] > > _mistune.py within the Debian package, > > and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune" > > (see /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbconvert/filters/markdown_mi