Re: Why is isal limited to just three archs?

2021-10-16 Thread Gregor Riepl
> Did you look into the source package? isal is written in assembly > language... That doesn't seem quite right. The readme states: > other: > > Compiler: Portable base functions are available that build with most C > compilers. And it does look like there are corresponding .c implementations, a

Re: Why is isal limited to just three archs?

2021-10-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 10:42, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 10/16/21 9:09 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Hi Ondřej, > > > > I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64. > > Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend > > support to other archs? > >

Re: Why is isal limited to just three archs?

2021-10-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/16/21 9:09 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi Ondřej, > > I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64. > Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend > support to other archs? > > Actually, a -med team package fastp has started to depend on > libisa

Why is isal limited to just three archs?

2021-10-16 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Ondřej, I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64. Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend support to other archs? Actually, a -med team package fastp has started to depend on libisal-dev, and this now is limited to the few archs isal s