On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:51:52AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> I believe there are a number of Python packages in Debian unstable that
> are out of date in respect to latest upstream.
>
> e.g.
>
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=bam%40debian.org&comaint=yes
>
> Somebody needs to do the w
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:48:05PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> Are you asking about testing or stable? Because for stable the "packages
> are either outdated or do not exist" situation is somewhat expected and
> testing is not that interesting case, though even in testing
On 2021-02-17 02:13, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Are you asking about testing or stable? Because for stable the "packages
> are either outdated or do not exist" situation is somewhat expected and
> testing is not that interesting case, though even in testing we may have a
> lot of outdated packages
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:48:05PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> > I *wish* I could
> > just install everything via the Debian Packaging System, but the reality for
> > most relevant Python packages is very different: packages are either
> > outdated or do not exist in Debian
>
> Are you talking about ma
On 2021-02-16 10:17, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I *wish* I could
> just install everything via the Debian Packaging System, but the reality for
> most relevant Python packages is very different: packages are either
> outdated or do not exist in Debian
Are you talking about many packages? Or only som
On 2021-02-16 18:24:20 + (+), Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Bastian (2021.02.16_09:17:18_+)
> > heck, even PIP is outdated in a way that you actually have to `pip
> > install -U pip` in order to use it properly due to the recent
> > manylinux change.
>
> Hrm, we probably should be backpor
Hi Bastian (2021.02.16_09:17:18_+)
> heck, even PIP is outdated in a way that you actually have to `pip
> install -U pip` in order to use it properly due to the recent
> manylinux change.
Hrm, we probably should be backporting support for manylinux2014. Care
to file a bug against pip?
SR
--
On 2/16/21 5:25 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi debian-python (2021.02.11_18:24:57_+)
>> I have prepared a policy MR for this:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/cpython-team/python3-defaults/-/merge_requests/8
>> It catches up on the current split situation, too.
>
> We had a discussion on the princi
On 12.02.21 01:11, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I understand that upstream python guys probably think the way to consume
python stuff is through venv, pip, and setuptools. I have a very
different view on this, and probably I'm not alone.
We (Debian people) indeed prefer if our user can enjoy a packaged
9 matches
Mail list logo
