> > This
> > package is blocking several others. Would it be best to remove it? It can
> > always be re-introduced if a python3 port appears.
>
> Since some time I've pushed a 2to3 based port to Git. I've now fixed
> some issues of this and I wonder whether we might give it a try to do
> the por
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> I had tried this,
> I think Passing [:-1] in the mask2 initialisation would fix this. We also
> need to cast this into a numpy array.
> ...
>
> I'll try this by midnight today. If I can, I'll try a fix for this, and
> make a MR, or
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, 14:16 Andreas Tille, wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> Hi,
>
> I have updated lazyarray in Git[1] (by moving it to Debian Science
> team). The old package was lagging way behind upstream and a Python3
> port is available by upstream so I just create the python3-lazyarray
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
I have updated lazyarray in Git[1] (by moving it to Debian Science
team). The old package was lagging way behind upstream and a Python3
port is available by upstream so I just create the python3-lazyarray
package fixing the open bugs.
Unfortunately there is an open
4 matches
Mail list logo
