Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, November 05, 2018 08:31:56 PM Jerome Kieffer wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500 > > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one > > in > > Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it. > > I got one also in fabio: > https://github.com

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Jerome Kieffer
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500 Scott Kitterman wrote: > I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one in > Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it. I got one also in fabio: https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243 Actually there has been a depreciation warning for ages (

Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, November 05, 2018 05:31:36 PM Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > po 5. 11. 2018 v 9:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > > Do other fellow DD also think it's kind of ok to keep 3.7 in Buster? > > +1 for keeping 3.7 in Buster and switch defaults to 3.7. I recently got burned by changes in

Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, po 5. 11. 2018 v 9:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > Do other fellow DD also think it's kind of ok to keep 3.7 in Buster? > +1 for keeping 3.7 in Buster and switch defaults to 3.7. Thanks. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573

Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/5/18 9:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there! > > During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November > if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time > has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to > open this thread. > >

Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05.11.18 09:17, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Hi there! >> >> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November >> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time >> has passed, RC bugs have bee

Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there! > > During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November > if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time > has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to > open this thr

Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster

2018-11-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi there! During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to open this thread. To me, as much as the OpenStack packages are concerned, I'