On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 30/09/2017 à 14:22, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>> Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part
>> of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it
>> is awesome.
>
> Maybe you should look at
On 30/09/17 16:50, Diane Trout wrote:
I am curious if Rebecca is using pandas on a non-intel architecture
though (was wondering how she noticed pandas hadn't built)
No - I found this email thread and checked
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pandas
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 12:26 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>
>
> > I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line,
> > install
> > sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx?
>
> Adding sphinx-common to B-D and keeping python3-sphinx in B-D-Indep
> is
> probably the easi
Hi,
Le 30/09/2017 à 14:22, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
> Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part
> of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it
> is awesome.
Maybe you should look at WNPP to see if someone filed a RFP or ITP, and
if not, su
Fwiw I have made a pycharm-community-sloppy package available from NeuroDebian
- just wrapped their distribution. Btw seems to work with open jdk just fine.
Packaging for Debian proper would need some Java verse maintainer.
On September 30, 2017 8:22:56 AM EDT, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
>Are
Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part
of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it
is awesome.
thanks
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
Hi -
I'd be very grateful if somebody could review my updated Veusz package
in the PAPT repository:
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/veusz/trunk/
I've updated it to Veusz 2.0.1. This upgrades to Qt5. I'm also building
for python 2 and 3. It now uses sphinx docs.
I've s
Hi Diane,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:55:13PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> Oops.
>
> I thought that it wouldn't try using sphinx when not building doc
> packages. But apparently being listed in "dh --with" counts as being
> used.
Yes, because dh tries to open Sequece/sphinxdoc.pm which is provided
On 29/09/17 23:55, Diane Trout wrote:
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 22:05 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
statsmodels passed NEW...and FTBFS with
dh: unable to load addon sphinxdoc: Can't locate
Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm in @INC
That file is in the sphinx-common package, which suggests t
On 29/09/17 23:55, Diane Trout wrote:
I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line, install
sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx?
For local testing of this, use pbuilder --debbuildopts -B
Given earlier messages that we want this working ASAP, always installing
10 matches
Mail list logo
