Hi Yaroslav,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:24:53PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Diane Trout wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 17:56 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > If you could allow to review would be great.
> > > Thanks for all the work.
> > > I was btw also tryi
I managed to merge the more important doc changes.
I have a patch to switch doc building to using Python 3 components, as
there's a goal of removing the Python 2 components at some point.
The there's the patch for the nodoc/nocheck build profile, as well as
adding a bunch of other dependencies fo
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 17:56 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > If you could allow to review would be great.
> > Thanks for all the work.
> > I was btw also trying to build with the patch you shared yesterday
> Once I have all the changes for pandas wou
If you could allow to review would be great.
Thanks for all the work.
I was btw also trying to build with the patch you shared yesterday
On September 21, 2017 5:48:58 PM EDT, Diane Trout wrote:
>
>> If my poor opinion counts: For the moment we should run those tests
>> in
>> the build process th
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 17:56 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> If you could allow to review would be great.
> Thanks for all the work.
> I was btw also trying to build with the patch you shared yesterday
Once I have all the changes for pandas would you like me to put them on
a branch on alioth? Or
> If my poor opinion counts: For the moment we should run those tests
> in
> the build process than can be easily be run. Everything else should
> probably be sorted out later (in autopkgtest or another later upload
> if
> somebody has a clue how we can solve the circular depenendecies).
>
> We
On 21/09/17 15:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
We somehow need to get some working spatstats to continue with other
packages.
I second Andreas' opinion. In principle, we'd want all tests to run at
build and integration times and we might achieve that at some point
during the Buster cycle.
Right no
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 05:48:48PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 September 2017 22:14:18 AEST Diane Trout wrote:
> > I just did it that way because it was the least disruptive change I
> > could make that would let me build and test the package.
>
> Sure, that's entirely sensi
8 matches
Mail list logo
