Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic

2017-09-05 Thread Christoph Biedl
Mathias Behrle wrote... > So finally I am still quite undetermined what to do to get the actual release > of relatorio packaged[5] (it will be needed for the next release of Tryton). > For > now there is only one usage of python-magic[6], so probably best to patch > relatorio for now to use file-

Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic

2017-09-05 Thread Christoph Biedl
Mathias Behrle wrote... > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep 2017 > 19:38:56 +0200): > > The cleanest solution indeed was to bring both upstreams together and > > ask them to reconcile the APIs and eventually make one of the both > > implementations obsole

Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic

2017-09-05 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:38:56 +0200): > Mathias Behrle wrote... > > > Current python(3)-magic in Debian is built from source package 'file'[0]. > (...) > > OTOH the package providing python-magic on PyPi[3] is provided by another > > U