Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-03 Thread Ben Finney
Brian May writes: > I just noticed that Ubuntu plan to drop Python 2.7 completely - from > default installs at least That's a pretty important modifier! Ubuntu does not yet plan to drop Python 2.7 completely. Rather, the current plan is to ensure no *dependencies on* Python 2.7 in the default

Re: next version of csvkit

2017-04-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 04, 2017, at 09:49 AM, Brian May wrote: > I just noticed that Ubuntu plan to drop Python 2.7 completely - from >default installs at least - for the 18.04 release: That's not the same as dropping Python 2.7 from the archive, which we're no where near close to doing. It's really just an ex

Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-03 Thread Brian May
On 2017-04-04 08:21, Brian May wrote: > I would suggest that Buster have Python 2.7, however we only support 3rd > party libraries where it is practical to do so. Any library that has > dropped Python 2.7 support upstream, is not practical for us to support > in Python2. Anything that depends on s

Re: What should Debian do about Python 2? (was Re: next version of csvkit)

2017-04-03 Thread Ben Finney
Brian May writes: > It is perhaps worth noting that Django 2.0 is due to be released in > December: > > https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2015/jun/25/roadmap/ Yes. More directly, Django 1.11 is planned to be the final Python-2-compatible release. From the above URL: As a final heads up,

Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-03 Thread Brian May
Vincent Bernat writes: > On the current subject, I also agree we should not drop prematurely > packages targeted to Python 2. It is likely the support will be extended > past 2020, at least by distributions with a 10-year support. RHEL 7 will be supported until 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wik

Re: What should Debian do about Python 2? (was Re: next version of csvkit)

2017-04-03 Thread Brian May
Barry Warsaw writes: > For libraries that already support 2 and 3, I don't think we necessarily need > to actively drop Python 2 yet. We have great tools, so it's usually just as > easy to continue supporting both. I'm on the fence for new library packages, > but I suppose if it's also just as

What should Debian do about Python 2? (was Re: next version of csvkit)

2017-04-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 01, 2017, at 05:12 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >Pasting the relevant quotes below: > >"The 2.x series of Python is due for deprecation and will not be maintained >past 2020 so it is recommended that Python 2 modules are not packaged unless >necessary." It's true that upstream will almost