On 03/24/2017 09:30 AM, Brian May wrote:
> So if we upgrade python-amqp *and* that (worse case) requires
> python-oslo.messaging be upgraded too, that is a lot of packages (listed
> below) that *directly* depend on python-oslo.messaging. Eventually we
> will have to deal with this, maybe during the
4.0.2+really3.0.35+dfsg-2 has been accepted into unstable.
Hopefully that sorts this mess out for now.
Thanks for your patience.
Christopher
On 24 March 2017 at 11:22, Christopher Hoskin
wrote:
> Agreed - I didn't know that was an option before. I'll try it this
> evening, unless someone beats
Agreed - I didn't know that was an option before. I'll try it this
evening, unless someone beats me to it.
Thank you for your help.
Christopher
On 24 March 2017 at 11:18, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On March 24, 2017 4:30:12 AM EDT, Brian May wrote:
> ...
>>Alternative: maybe I should go to t
On March 24, 2017 4:30:12 AM EDT, Brian May wrote:
...
>Alternative: maybe I should go to the other plan of uploading the old
>version of kombu with an increased epoch?
Please use newversion+reallyoldverssion instead of an epoch. It's generally
better to avoid epochs for temporary issues like
Michael Fladischer writes:
> This seems to be the best way to deal with this. I don't think that
> python-amqp 2.x should be uploaded to unstable as it would potentially
> break a lot of things in OpenStack.
I will wait a little bit in case there is a response to
https://bugs.debian.org/858586,
Christopher Hoskin writes:
> I've filed a bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858586
>
> Very sorry about this mess. This is what comes of trying to do
> something complex and precise late at night after a long day's work :(
I can't complain. I have also accidentally uploaded
On 2017-03-24 03:55, Brian May wrote:
> * Upload previous Kombu to unstable, using an epoch for the version (and
> all subsequent uploads).
This seems to be the best way to deal with this. I don't think that
python-amqp 2.x should be uploaded to unstable as it would potentially
break a lot of thin
Christopher Hoskin writes:
> What worries me is:
>
> apt-rdepends -r python-amqp
I wasn't aware of this command. Thanks for this.
If I understand this command correctly, it is showing everything that
depends directly and indirectly on python-amqp?
Hmm. Looks like a large number of these are du
8 matches
Mail list logo
