Re: Team upload for python-jedi

2017-01-18 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 13:37 +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > Hi, > > [Ghislain Vaillant, 2017-01-18] > > Would you be ok if I push the changes required to fix #830399 and > > #841043 for src:python-jedi and prepare a team-upload? > > > > I need the RC fixed for the packaging of spyder. > > go ahe

Team upload for python-jedi

2017-01-18 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Piotr, Would you be ok if I push the changes required to fix #830399 and #841043 for src:python-jedi and prepare a team-upload? I need the RC fixed for the packaging of spyder. Cheers, Ghis

Re: Team upload for python-jedi

2017-01-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
Hi, [Ghislain Vaillant, 2017-01-18] > Would you be ok if I push the changes required to fix #830399 and > #841043 for src:python-jedi and prepare a team-upload? > > I need the RC fixed for the packaging of spyder. go ahead. I have almost working package with latest changes from upstream git repo

Fattura TIM linea Fissa - Gennaio 2017 - scadenza 12/01/2017

2017-01-18 Thread Telecom Italia-TIM
<<< text/html: Unrecognized >>>

Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages

2017-01-18 Thread Debian/GNU
On 2017-01-18 07:46, Scott Kitterman wrote: > +··named·django_packagename·upstream.··These·are·then·packaged·as > +··python3-django-package·and please use "package" vs "packagename" consistently. e.g. an upstream named "django_packagename" should be packaged as "python3-django-pa