Re: Python 2 in the default installation -- progress made!

2016-12-29 Thread Matthias Klose
On 30.12.2016 05:41, Stuart Prescott wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > one of the objectives for stretch was to reduce the number of Python 2 > packages that are installed in common scenarios, instead having the Python 3 > stack take over. The "standard task" within tasksel is a reasonable place to

Python 2 in the default installation -- progress made!

2016-12-29 Thread Stuart Prescott
Hi everyone, one of the objectives for stretch was to reduce the number of Python 2 packages that are installed in common scenarios, instead having the Python 3 stack take over. The "standard task" within tasksel is a reasonable place to look.¹ Thanks to the recent work on reportbug and debia

Re: Bug#848416: RFS: pyvtk/0.5.18-1 [ITA]

2016-12-29 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Pierre, On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 09:20:02PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Le mardi 27 décembre 2016 à 22:11:38+, Sean Whitton a écrit : > > Hello Pierre, > > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 06:04:58PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > > Le lundi 26 décembre 2016 à 20:38:42+,

Re: Bug#848416: RFS: pyvtk/0.5.18-1 [ITA]

2016-12-29 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le mardi 27 décembre 2016 à 22:11:38+, Sean Whitton a écrit : > Hello Pierre, > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 06:04:58PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Le lundi 26 décembre 2016 à 20:38:42+, Sean Whitton a écrit : > > > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > > > > > Dear Pierre, > > > > > > T

Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16

2016-12-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:20:23AM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, Hi! FYI, I found your RFS only thanks to the /topic in #debian-python. Unless you're very lucky most RFSes sent to random mailing lists have a tendency to get lost/ignored; that's why I suggest you always file a RFS bug and X-Deb